Comments on: UPDATED – The Supremes: The road to today’s decision http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/ Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:05:25 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » Respecting the Geneva Convention http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-103640 Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » Respecting the Geneva Convention Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:09:39 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-103640 [...] UPDATED - The Supremes: The road to today’s decision [...] [...] UPDATED – The Supremes: The road to today’s decision [...]

]]> By: Mike's America http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85654 Mike's America Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:51:09 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85654 Here's one old broad that doesn't take any crap! <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KACQuZVAE3s&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KACQuZVAE3s&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> Here’s one old broad that doesn’t take any crap!

]]> By: dude http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85640 dude Sat, 14 Jun 2008 23:59:29 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85640 "How flattering… you’re in to “ol’ broads”??? :0)" You're right. You probably would not be into younger guys who only think of deviant physical pleasures of the flesh. Actually, I find older women devilishly sexy... “How flattering… you’re in to “ol’ broads”??? :0)”

You’re right. You probably would not be into younger guys who only think of deviant physical pleasures of the flesh. Actually, I find older women devilishly sexy…

]]> By: Hutch http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85444 Hutch Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:28:58 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85444 I have no problem with this; provided Homeland Security is given a Carte Blanche Warrant for surveillance of any and all persons (including legal counsel, interpreters, and civilian Justices) who have contact with the prisoners during or anytime after discovery. Our intel on these guys must be getting old. We might get something more up to date if we let them play their games a bit. I have no problem with this; provided Homeland Security is given a Carte Blanche Warrant for surveillance of any and all persons (including legal counsel, interpreters, and civilian Justices) who have contact with the prisoners during or anytime after discovery. Our intel on these guys must be getting old. We might get something more up to date if we let them play their games a bit.

]]> By: MataHarley http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85388 MataHarley Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:55:54 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85388 Well, from one old broad to another, my thanks for your complements. Or did you really mean "geezer"?? Well, from one old broad to another, my thanks for your complements. Or did you really mean “geezer”??

]]> By: Missy http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85385 Missy Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:46:18 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85385 Not "ol broads"!!!! I think he's into intellect Mata and yours is equivalent to a geiser. Another old broad's humble opinion. Enjoy that date. Not “ol broads”!!!! I think he’s into intellect Mata and yours is equivalent to a geiser. Another old broad’s humble opinion. Enjoy that date.

]]> By: MataHarley http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85371 MataHarley Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:45:21 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85371 How flattering... you're in to "ol' broads"??? :0) How flattering… you’re in to “ol’ broads”??? :0)

]]> By: dude http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85367 dude Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:38:04 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85367 That's OK Mata I forgive you. When are we going on our date? That’s OK Mata I forgive you. When are we going on our date?

]]> By: MataHarley http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85328 MataHarley Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:21:22 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85328 Correct dude. I appeared status "pro <strike>se</strike> per", for the "per se" helmet law issue. Sorry to not be clear. (must stop multi-tasking today... geeez...) uh, lemme just speak English. LOL I represented myself in the proper person on the issue of the helmet law not affecting my ability to ride effectively, despite the law Correct dude. I appeared status “pro se per”, for the “per se” helmet law issue. Sorry to not be clear. (must stop multi-tasking today… geeez…)

uh, lemme just speak English. LOL I represented myself in the proper person on the issue of the helmet law not affecting my ability to ride effectively, despite the law

]]> By: dude http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85325 dude Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:12:18 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85325 "pro se" not "per se" “pro se” not “per se”

]]> By: Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » McCain - “One of the Worst Decisions in the History of this Country.” http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85309 Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » McCain - “One of the Worst Decisions in the History of this Country.” Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:39:11 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85309 [...] the SCOTUS did here is beyond precedent. As Mataharley wrote about here and as Justice Roberts points out: Today the Court strikes down as inadequate the most [...] [...] the SCOTUS did here is beyond precedent. As Mataharley wrote about here and as Justice Roberts points out: Today the Court strikes down as inadequate the most [...]

]]> By: Thomnj http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85246 Thomnj Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:54:16 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85246 It would be nice to see the Congress step in and take responsibility for what is theirs in our government (okay people, stop laughing!) and reject the Supremes' decision by re-affirming the acts passed AND by denoting that Congress makes the law - not the Supremes or any other court. Give a hearty thank you to the Supremes for pointing out what may be a flaw and then proceed to add a sentence or two in the acts to fix that flaw. It would be nice to see the Congress step in and take responsibility for what is theirs in our government (okay people, stop laughing!) and reject the Supremes’ decision by re-affirming the acts passed AND by denoting that Congress makes the law – not the Supremes or any other court. Give a hearty thank you to the Supremes for pointing out what may be a flaw and then proceed to add a sentence or two in the acts to fix that flaw.

]]> By: wilyone41 http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/06/12/the-supremes-the-road-to-todays-decision/#comment-85213 wilyone41 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:50:21 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/?p=5576#comment-85213 Where this is actually going... The libs on the court obviously will soon rule that terrorits are merely conducting political dissent in their actions, so we in the USA have no right to stop them in their dissent. Therefore, if any person should even think about trying to stop terrorism, or interfering with attacks on the US, they would be violating the terrorist's rights, and the people involved should be jailed. I can't believe that the lawyers for these terrorists were somehow able to force themselves past that image of mohammed on the supreme court building to argue this...that was probably a violation of those lawyer's rights too! Where this is actually going…

The libs on the court obviously will soon rule that terrorits are merely conducting political dissent in their actions, so we in the USA have no right to stop them in their dissent.

Therefore, if any person should even think about trying to stop terrorism, or interfering with attacks on the US, they would be violating the terrorist’s rights, and the people involved should be jailed.

I can’t believe that the lawyers for these terrorists were somehow able to force themselves past that image of mohammed on the supreme court building to argue this…that was probably a violation of those lawyer’s rights too!

]]>