He’ll have sore knees and a sore rectum when the Big O gets done with him.

He’s just not smart enough to know it yet.

“Assuming that affirmative action helped Senator Obama get into Harvard Law School, it’s implausible that everybody there, the professors as well as his fellow students, gave him a pass. Remember to them he was just another student, no family connections. “

You’re making lots of assumptions there Dave. “Implausibe his professors and fellow students at Affirmative Action/PC Harvard gave a half black, half white with a funny name a pass?

Don’t make me laugh.

And “no family connections?” Again, another hoot! His rich white granny who was VP at the Bank of Hawaii couldn’t pull a few strings?

Come on. Get real Dave!

Now, let’s get back to considering why this supposed brilliant and well educated man can’t speak without a teleprompter, let alone remember how many different versions of “no preconditions” before talks with Iran he has uttered.

Before I get to my stuff. Total flame of Kimmy. All heat, zero light. I know you’re better than that.

Again, let’s wait for the general election debates. No teleprompter there.

Chris,

I didn’t need anybody to program me. I watched the 2000 and 2004 Presidential debates. I also watched many of the President’s speeches and press conferences. He was consistently less than impressive even with the aid of a teleprompter and a team of speechwriters. He speaks English as though it were a second language. If he’s dyslexic, I’m sorry, but that’s not an excuse for his lackluster performance.

The President’s SAT scores are public knowledge. As a matter of comparison only, mine are higher. Not only am I no genius, there is no way on God’s green earth I have the requisite intellect to be the leader of the Free World.

He received an MBA from Harvard where his family had no influence? Please tell me where in establishment America the President’s family has no influence. He is the son of a President, the grandson of a Senator, and the scion of two of the most politically and economically connected families in America – the Bushes and the Walkers.

Define Marxist. BTW, the Cold War is over and we won. I suspect your definition would put every government in the First World in that category – Europe, Scandinavia, Canada.

Finally, American Mike,

Assuming that affirmative action helped Senator Obama get into Harvard Law School, it’s implausible that everybody there, the professors as well as his fellow students, gave him a pass.
Remember to them he was just another student, no family connections. As they were competing their asses off to max out their grades and get an offer from a top firm, I don’t think anyone covered his ass as he screwed up his law review editor duties.

I wonder what would have happened if George Bush at the age of 18 had been given the chance to exchange his legacy for the opportunity to become the half-black child of a single mother. Do you think he would have taken the deal and jumped on that affirmative action gravy train?

You’re funny.

Disconnected from reality and dispossessed of any sort of knowledge, but funny nonetheless.

Actually the article is from a blog and written for Reuters. No misleading there. Sorry Kimmy but Obama really is a socialist and even the Paulbots who believe 9-11 was an inside job understand that. If you support Obama’s marxist planks, great. It is a free country. But I do not support marxism in either form (national socialism or global Mao/Lenninist socialism).

This Is meant to imply that Ron Paul’s delegation even though they may be against the war in Iraq may not agree with all of Obama’s Positions…

You make it Sound like Reuters themselves are calling Mr. Obama a “raving socialist” which they ARE NOT…. Stop The Misleading ..

President Obama ‘09 ..

I wonder how long till that phrase is scrubbed.

Sorry you think the way you do about our President. He really is very intelligent and the senoir officers I work with in the Army, who deal with him, agree. It is sad that the left has programmed you to believe such, but you are not alone. But let’s not focus on the gaffs of an exhausted President with deslexia who succeeded in spite of it.

I DO have issues with some of his policies (immigration/amnesty, not standing up to the left’s attacks, not putting responisbility back on the left for programs they wrote but blame him for), however, he is not “over his head intellectually”.

One does not fly nuclear armed pre-computer era fighters, govern a state, earn a masters from Ivy League schools where ones family does not matter and be what you ascribe president Bush as being.

That said, I really wish President Bush was a conservative, not a social moderate. I wish McCain was also. I know what Obama is: a devout Marxist.

So the left gets a great choice this year: a Marxist who can deflect scandals and silence critics with a shout of “rascist” or a “maverick” Republican who, until this election, was the darling of the left. Congrats, either way, the left wins.

Show me a string of examples where Obie has been able to speak effectively without the TelePrompter and then perhaps the Obie/Tiger comparison will be valid.

Tiger is consistently good with very few goofs. When he’s good he is able to do it without assistance.

Not that difficult if you can claim affirmative action.

Looks to me Dave Noble that you shouldn’t be criticizing President Bush’s ability to formulate a strategy and impelement it. That’s a skill that Obama has shown no aptitude for at all, much less getting any kind of bipartisan support.

But maybe they didn’t teach at Affirmative Action U.