http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:9IqeX3hovr8J:my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/juancarloscruz/gG5BSr/

This stuff was up before his AIPAC speech and it took a couple of months and Little Green Footballs exposing it to get them to realize his official web site is no place for slandering the Jewish community.

You have surmised correctly that I am indeed Jewish, and indeed Israeli. That is about the extent of your correct assumptions.

Nowhere in the Torah does it say anything about an apocalypse preceding the coming of the Messiah. I don’t spend all day on my knees praying, and if I did, I would definitely not be praying for that.

Now, regarding your outrageous claims about our foreign policy. If you can name me ONE instance, and I mean ONE, of the Israeli military deliberately target non-military targets, I’d be happy to hear it. Oh wait, you can’t find any. Everything we do is carefully planned so as to have as little collateral damage as possible. It’s a bit of a problem, considering the enemy hides among innocent civilians so as to provoke us to attack them, thus inviting even MORE international scrutiny for our actions, but we do get it done amazingly well considering the situation.

Additionally, if you can find one instance of Israel telling the United States what to do, I’d be happy to hear that as well.

You make these outrageously ludicrous claims without any ounce of historical or factual support, and you come off as an imbecile.

Your statement that it makes no difference to you who lives and who dies in the Middle East, let alone the implied “any part of the world except the grand ol’ United States” is rank of ignorance, apathy, and downright evil.

Go read a book.

This would be Obama’s reaction to Lieberman’s Senate floor criticism of that speech.

It’s appears you can take the boy out of Chicago, but you can’t take Chicago out of the boy!

Here’s Jake Tapper’s account of Obama’s “Chicago diplomacy” on Lieberman following that speech.

Returning to the Senate after his securing the Democratic presidential nomination, Obama and Lieberman greeted each on the Senate floor in the Well as they were voting on the budget resolution.

They shook hands. But Obama didn’t let go, leading Lieberman – cordially – by the hand across the room into a corner on the Democratic side, where Democratic sources tell ABC News he delivered some tough words for the junior senator from Connecticut, who had just minutes before hammered Obama’s speech before the pro-Israel group AIPAC in a conference call arranged by the McCain campaign.

snip (see article for link to partial video)

The two spoke intensely for approximately five minutes, with no one able to hear their conversation. Reporters watched as Obama leaned closely in to Lieberman, whose back was literally up against the wall.

Neither party is officially talking. But while Lieberman spokesman Marshall Whitman says the conversation was “a cordial and friendly discussion” and Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton says it was “private and friendly,” Democratic sources tell ABC News that the conversation was a stern rebuke to Lieberman for his criticism of the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee on the conference call, as well as a discussion about how far Lieberman is willing to go in his advocacy of McCain, and the tone of the campaign.

Are you kidding? It’s impossible that you’re completely oblivious to, let’s see, every speech that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has made in the past 3 years.

I agree, the growing population of Arabs is a major concern here, but there are solutions being addressed in the Knesset. The biggest problem is Hizb’Allah, and Iran’s support for them. You can’t argue that Ahmadinejad wants to wait 32 years for Israel’s destruction when he’s actively aiding a terrorist organization bent on destroying us.

Curious, how will talking w Iran work? Go there, sit down, ask em to:
stop killing Americans in Iraq
end their nuclear program
and stop calling for the destruction of Israel

Then, because GWB or Pres Obama went there and personally conveyed these long public desires, they suddenly agree? OR does the US have to give Iran something in return, something that will appease them?

btw, as I’ve said before, I personally favor unconditional talks w Iran. If I were President, I’d fly there in AF1, land w all the world’s press corps, set up a table outside the US embassy that’s been abandoned since it was overrun in 1979, and I’d state the desires listed above all with the backdrop of DEATH TO AMERICA painted on the embassy. I’d even offer to provide nuclear equipment and material as has been done for years now; as was the Kerry and DNC platform in 2004. It wouldn’t work, but would prove (as Sen Obama claimed the other night) that the onus for action rests with Iran.

I’m reading former Secretary of State George Shultz’s memoir “Turmoil and Triumph” and for those who forgot what the diplomatic dance was like with the Soviets it is a good reminder. Even meetings between the Secretary of State and the Soviet Foreign Minister took months of patient preparation and there were LOTS of preconditions.

Even before any of those high level meetings were to take place, President Reagan quietly demanded that the Soviets make a demonstration of their good faith by releasing a group of Pentacostalists who had tried to emigrate.

As has been pointed out the Europeans and other states in the region have been attempting to negotiate with Iran on nuclear and other issues FOR YEARS and there has been absolutely no progress.

It’s clear evidence of the dangerously naive mindset of the Obamatons that somehow they think that a face to face meeting with their false messiah will somehow change all of that. They don’t understand the negative consequences of what they are suggesting because they don’t have the intellectual depth and experience necessary to do so. And neither does their candidate.

I wonder if he even knows what country he is in, he sure doesn’t talk very positive about America. He is after all running for President , not church pastor.