25
Apr

McCain: Against Negative Campaigning Before He Was For It?

Posted by: Mike's America @ 6:34 pm in Uncategorized

Visited 767 times, 1 so far today

Not OK to link Rev. Wright with Obama in North Carolina, but OK to link Obama with Hamas terrorists?

I’m confused!

This week GOP presidential candidate John McCain repeatedly condemned the North Carolina GOP ad which shows a short clip of one of the infamous rants of Obama’s pastor Reverend Wright and asks if North Carolina Democrat leaders should have endorsed Obama?

We all know that Senator McCain wants to take the high road this election year. But in the same week he denounced the mild ad in North Carolina, he responded to the Hamas terrorist leader who said “Actually, we like Mr. Obama. We hope he will [win] the election” by saying: “I think it is very clear who Hamas wants to be the next president of the United States … I think that the people should understand that I will be Hamas’ worst nightmare.”

Asked later if his remarks amounted to a negative attack he responded that they were simply a “statement of fact.”

But isn’t it also a statement of fact that Democrat leaders in North Carolina have endorsed Obama? Wasn’t the NC GOP right in pointing out that Obama’s beliefs are too “extreme” for North Carolina?

Some see this as just another example of McCain sticking it to conservatives. His action in this episode reinforces many of the concerns and negative impressions many conservatives still hold for McCain.

“Man Up,” Sen. McCain
By Arnold Ahlert
Political Mavens

On Wednesday, John McCain demanded that the North Carolina Republican Party remove a TV ad featuring Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s “God damn America” sermon which is being used to portray two Democratic gubernatorial candidates who support Barack Obama as “too extreme.” “There is no place for that kind of campaigning,” said the Republican nominee for president. Memo to Sen. McCain: wake up and smell the coffee.

The 20-year relationship between Barack Obama and his anti-American, black separatist “mentor” is fair game. So are his political associations with former Weather Underground terrorists William Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn and his “close friendship” with indicted real estate developer Tony Rezko.

Mr. Obama is not running for college president on some lunatic left-wing campus, Senator. He’s running for the most powerful office in the world, and the public ought to be well acquainted with the company he’s kept and keeping–loud and often.

Incredible as it seems from here, perhaps you’re still naive enough to believe the media which has treated you with kid gloves whenever you tilted left is going to give you even-handed coverage once the slug-fest between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama produces a winner. One would think the hit-piece published by the New York Times regarding your ostensible extra-marital affair–a compendium of innuendoes, shoddy reporting and outright lies–would have given you a clue as to what is coming.

Either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama will do anything and everything to undermine your candidacy. How do I know? Take a good look at what they’re doing to EACH OTHER, Senator. Multiply by ten.

This is one American who’s damn tired of a Republican candidate for president who thinks going toe-to-toe with two irredeemable socialists is “unseemly.” Better to “disrespect” them than that part of the American electorate–hopefully a majority–which yearns to see a Republican show a little backbone. Nothing is more “hardball” than a presidential election.

“Man up,” Mr. McCain.

To those who had been thinking of sending in a donation to the McCain campaign but were offended by McC’s latest move, why not make a donation to the North Carolina GOP so they can continue to televise this ad? And let them know why you are contributing to them and not McCain.



Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Friday, April 25th, 2008 at 6:34 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

9 comments so far

Dreadnought
 1Reply to this comment  

This is what stresses me out about McCain. He is so ready to make conciliatory gestures to idiots when the thing to do would be to let them flap in the wind. The NCGOP add is none of his business - it’s aimed at a local race.

But he was spot on about the Hamas endorsement. I have no doubt that Obama hates to get this kind of endorsement, and I don’t think ‘guilt by association’ applies here (unlike with Wright and Ayres). But the simple fact that Hamas feels like they will have a better chance to achieve their goals with Obama in the White House is very telling - they feel he will be weaker than McCain or even Hillary, and maybe even sympathetic.

A great man once said, “Diplomacy is the art of saying ‘nice doggy’ while reaching for a stick”. How effective will Obama’s diplomacy be if nobody believes he might back up his words with action?

April 25th, 2008 at 7:06 pm
 2Reply to this comment  

The Iranians and FARC terrorists in Colombia have also made similar statements about Obama. He’s the terrorists best friend!

How long before Osama gets in the act?

April 25th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
 3Reply to this comment  

Agree with fellow ldot-dude, Dreadnought, here. McCain was right about Hamas endorsement not being much of a plus for BHO. But still… geez Maverick… we’re all underwhelmingly impressed with your PC caves for appearance sake. Whining about the NC GOP ads, yet tackling the Hamas ads. I swear, the pickin’s are so dang slim this election year.

Despite McCain’s correct call on Hamas, it’s most likely BHO will react to that support just as he did with the Black Panther’s endorsement - that is to ignore it, and just remove it quietly from his campaign website (were he to actually have the “audacity” to post it as to begin with… unlikely).

Or perhaps he’ll react the same as he did about Farrakhan’s endorsement…

“I can’t say to somebody that he can’t say that he thinks I’m a good guy,”

Well… if Hamas thinks BHO’s a good guy, that is more than enuf endorsement for me. I’ll vote D… none of the above…

April 25th, 2008 at 9:05 pm
Gregory Dittman
 4Reply to this comment  

There is a difference between buying the murder weapon at a gun show from a mass killer and help hiding the bodies. I think McCain wants to stay away from association attacks and stick to direct attacks on why Hillary and Barack are the wrong people to elect president.

April 25th, 2008 at 9:40 pm
 5Reply to this comment  

No thanks. I’m with McCain on this one. My money goes to him, and not a penny to North Carolina. Forget “throwing conservatives under the bus”; that so many so-called conservatives want to throw monkey shit instead of discuss issues says more about them than it does anything else. Me, I’m content to let the Democrats do that.

April 26th, 2008 at 8:46 am
 6Reply to this comment  

Greg: I really am confused. I don’t see McCain staying away from association politics AT ALL:

McCain blasts Obama on Hamas
Friday, April 25, 2008 4:38 PM by Mark Murray

In recent days, McCain has taken some critical — and, some might argue, personal — shots at Obama. On Sunday, McCain questioned the tenuous association Obama has with the former ’60s radical William Ayers. Yesterday, he delivered a jab at Obama’s association with Jeremiah Wright. (Responding to questions about the endorsement he received from the controversial pastor John Hagee, the Arizona senator said, “I didn’t attend Pastor Hagee’s church for 20 years.”)

And today, on a call with conservative bloggers, McCain said this: “I think it’s very clear who Hamas wants to be the next president of the United States. So apparently has Danny Ortega and several others. I think that people should understand that I will be Hamas’s worst nightmare… If Senator Obama is favored by Hamas I think people can make judgments accordingly.”

McCain left off the Iranian press report which practically endorsed Obama and the Colombian FARC terrorist statement which suggested Obama would be more favorable to their cause.

When Obama’s people complained about association politics, the McCain spokesman responded:

“It is not only responsible to raise these critical issues in this election, but it would be the height of irresponsibility not to have this discussion with the American people.”

But when McCain trashed the NC GOP he had to know it would only elevate the issue and get the ad played all over the place for free.

April 26th, 2008 at 8:52 am
Uddercha0s
 7Reply to this comment  

Let’s not forget that Gitmo Terrorist Attorneys support Obama as well.

http://www.miamiherald.com/campaign08/story/397317.html

(How far down the whale sh*t scale do you have to go to reach Terrorist Attorney status?)

April 26th, 2008 at 9:40 am
Gregory Dittman
 8Reply to this comment  

Maybe it was a deal with Barack. He wouldn’t go negative if Barack didn’t go negative. Barack went negative, so McCain is going negative.

Maybe it was a technical issue that he wanted out in the open. Since McCain took public funds, he can’t take private funds. So what he and the Republicans are saying these are ads against state Democrats and federal senatorial Democrats using Obama as an “evil” associate of these people. That way the Democrats can’t come back later saying they were ads attacking Obama for the presidental election.

April 26th, 2008 at 1:05 pm
Machiavelli
 9Reply to this comment  

I appreciate McCain’s early ideal of trying to keep the campaign clean, take the high road, and stick with the “real” issues out there.
But, as the saying goes “nice guys finish last,” and while going TOO negative turns people off; totally avoiding the tactic is like declaring open season on yourself. The radical left certainly isn’t going to play nice; and at least in my opinion, the American people deserve to know that the declared enemies of our nation think that a BHO Presidency would be a good thing for them. Take from that what you will…
So yes, McCain’s apparent lack of clarity on the matter of negative campaigning is confusing to be sure. Then again, we live in a world that requires hard-headed realism, so in keeping with that McCain’s advisors may simply be phasing in a new strategy.

April 26th, 2008 at 2:16 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

Email me if your comment is caught in spam

If you find your posts being held for moderation, sign up at OpenID and login using that. This will avoid moderation.