It is pretty bizarre, when terror plots are constantly being uncovered, to see how much currency there is to the idea that there is something wrong with recognizing a plot.

Really, the conspiracy nuts and the anti-conspiracy nuts are the same phenomenon. Neither are interested in the truth, only in maintaining their world view.

The memorial conspiracy is elaborate as well, but it is certainly not WIDE. My best guess is that it only involves two people: Paul Murdoch and his wife. Everyone else is a dupe, though at this point quite a few of them are knowingly giving false information to the public in a desperate attempt to cover up what they have allowed.

If it came out of some resource that the architect could be shown to have previously used, it would be a grand slam. 

And I doubt most of the resistance you get to changing this comes from anyone who full well knows what this is.  At this point, I’m guessing the majority of resistance is from politicians, elected or unelected, that don’t want to tread into something that potentially violates Political Correctness and also don’t want to admit they were duped by a handful people who created and pushed a thinly veiled salute to the terrorists and their mission. 

That’s why I call you brain dead: because instead of trying to understand, you are determined NOT to understand even a simple geometric fact. But brain dead is not quite the right term. You ARE using your brain power. You are using it to come up with excuses NOT to make sense.

Anyone who wants to look further at how this almost exact Mecca orientation is repeated in the Tower of Voices, or at the hidden exact Mecca orientation (corresponding to the "true" crescent as Murdoch describes it thematically, where the upper crescent tip is created by the flight path "breaking the circle") take a good look at the map of betrayal.

Beyond that, however, who cares?

And there ya have it…..our liberal brethren.

Anything essentially eastward-pointing would be generally Mecca-oriented.

Beyond that, however, who cares?  Let me rephrase that; obviously you care.  I don’t care.  As to "braindead"–well, whatever.

Quite right, though, to note the challenge that a genuine conspiracy presents to the conservative movement. Can it be that the dishonesty of the Troofers has made conservatives so wary of seeing conspiracy that many will not even look at the facts for fear of the conspiracy taint?

I suspect that is a big part of the explanation for why the biggest conservative voices are ducking this issue (and I think I’ve inundated them with enough emails to say that a bunch of them are at least aware of the issue).  This is a pretty ironic place to find such a strong reluctance to consider the possibility of an enemy plot, given that Flight 93 is supposed to be the symbol of our woken vigilance: that we know now that we are at war with an enemy that hides amongst us, pretending to be trustworthy friends.

It is not even a mystery. We hosted an open design competition in time of war, inviting the whole world to enter. What the hell did we expect? That the enemy would say, "no, we don’t believe in taking such sneaky advantage of the infidels’ blasphemous policies of openness"?

"Almost exactly!!!!!!"