Mar

retired Gen. Jack Keane: Clinton Won’t Withdraw From Iraq

Posted by: Scott @ 4:02 am in Bush Derangement Syndrome, Dem eats Dem, Middle East, Military, Moonbats, Politics, Post-Invastion, Pre-Invasion, The Clintons, The Iraqi War, The Shadow Party, War On Terror

Visited 1188 times, 1 so far today

Ouch! With friends like this…who needs a Republican opponent?

Kean told the New York Sun this past weekend: “I have no doubts whatsoever that if she were president in January ‘09 she would not act irresponsibly and issue orders to conduct an immediate withdrawal from Iraq, regardless of the consequences, and squander the gains that have been made.”

He also said Clinton “generally supported the surge strategy in the sense she wanted it to succeed but she was skeptical about its chances.”

Now, how is Hillary Clinton supposed to win over the peaceful terrorists who bombed a recruiting station this week? How’s Code Pink gonna deal with that? How about ANSWER or party insiders like Gov Dean?

Let’s recap:

Senator Clinton promoted the invasion of Iraq
Senator Clinton used all of her experience and her unique intelligence asset (her husband) to determine if the intel reporting was accurate, bad, or lies
Senator Clinton authorized the invasion of Iraq
Senator Clinton supported the war in Iraq
Senator Clinton funded the war in Iraq (repeatedly)
Senator Clinton called for more troops to Iraq before President Bush did
Senator Clinton vowed in a DNC debate to keep US forces in Iraq until the Bush Admin objectives were met-even if it took till 2013!
Now we have her military advisors telling us, ‘yeah, she’s not gonna do the far left, anti-war, pseudo-peace-movement’s bidding

Interesting…

“It’s 3am…”

Print This Post

This entry was posted on Saturday, March 8th, 2008 at 4:02 am and is filed under Bush Derangement Syndrome, Dem eats Dem, Middle East, Military, Moonbats, Politics, Post-Invastion, Pre-Invasion, The Clintons, The Iraqi War, The Shadow Party, War On Terror. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

12 comments so far

zorro

How about withdrawing those bank accounts ?

Carlyle Capital’s lenders are UBS, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, JPMorgan Chase, ING, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse, Citigroup, BNP Paribas, Bear Stearns, Banc of America and Calyon, according to its annual report. And linked to the Carlyle Group, likely many, many more based in Washington and one of the world’s largest private equity companies.

Bush and Company capital funding group is the curse on America, and Mainstream Media first line Journalist should also ask the question where is the Republicans getting its money from? Just asking Hillary Clinton where her money comes from is not balanced and has not been for decades. This whole Carlyle Group is loaded with a bunch of creeps including the Rockefellers and Arab Bin Laden family with Bush and family have been screwing America for decades.

The abuses and corruption hidden in the IRS and National Security Secrets are likely confounding with incredible illegal proportions that will likely destroy those connected this debacle for generation if not completely from this time forward.

Here is a good story likely much, much worse than reported.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/07/business/07cndcarlyle.php

Its interesting some analyst are not even sure where these guy’s are based out of. Simply incredible, here America has major money managers avoiding FISA and likely financing major wars are shielded with tax haven Channel Islands laws or International treaties for money. That’s cool for money, but when things come to torture and water boarding and International human rights laws screw the individual, its o.k. there too.

Some analysts said that the fund, based in Guernsey, the Channel Islands. Where the hell is this ? Isn’t it something Americans are really stupid.

March 8th, 2008 at 6:37 am

ChrisG

Wow…. Tinfoil too tight today?

March 8th, 2008 at 6:48 am

Mike's America

off topic here, but something to save for future reference is H.R.C. is the nominee:

“It really isn’t playing out as a feminist issue,” said Susan Cannon, 55, of Big Horn, who supports Obama. “I think how much I would love to see a female president in my lifetime, but I can’t let that … trump the other concerns that I have.”

March 8th, 2008 at 9:37 am

Tom the Redhunter

I have no idea what in the world zorro is talking about.

Re the post, as you point out, Scott, Sen Clinton has got a small needle to thread. On the one hand she had to convince the far left that she’s anti-war. On the other she wants to convince the rest of us that she’s tough on defense. With this statement by Gen Keane, she’s going to have a lot of trouble with the former.

March 8th, 2008 at 9:42 am

David

Hmmm … that’s curious. At a campaign stop in Wyoming, Hillary advocated a complete withdrawal from Iraq - the sooner, the better.

As for ” … He also said Clinton “generally supported the surge strategy in the sense she wanted it to succeed but she was skeptical about its chances …”, I don’t find that convincing at all. When GEN Petraeus gave his report last fall, I remember Hillary saying his assessment did not coincide with the conditions on the ground, words to that effect.

March 8th, 2008 at 9:51 am

Richard Romano

Hey guys, what do you think of this:

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1720477,00.html?xid=rss-topstories

I know that AQ is doing all they can to grab the headlines — our boys and gals are letting them have it, but I am concerned about this development.

March 8th, 2008 at 6:14 pm

MariesTwoCents

I thought Hillary was getting her money from Dishwashers in Chinatown?

But then again what do I know?

March 8th, 2008 at 6:46 pm

ChrisG

Richard,

Your guess is probably accurate. AQ is doing a last ditch effort to get headlines running up to the elections. The thing is, and they are doing this in Afghanistan also, that they are making 1000s of new enemies with every bombing. All those people they killed have families, and those families are tied to sheks (or sheiks, or shakes depending on your spelling). Those sheiks control the tribes/clans and clans do not forget who wronged them, or who helped them. They know the Coalition has helped them and AQ slaughtered them.

March 8th, 2008 at 7:32 pm

Richard Romano

Thanks Chris — we’ll keep praying for our troops and the Iraqi people…we have to stop these Islamic sadists once and for all. The sickening thing is that Michael Moore once called these killers “freedom fighters” (!!!). The left will have to answer to God for the innocent blood on their hands.

March 8th, 2008 at 9:36 pm