<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pretty Remarkable!!! That&#8217;s an Understatement!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/27/pretty-remarkable-thats-an-understatement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/27/pretty-remarkable-thats-an-understatement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/27/pretty-remarkable-thats-an-understatement/#comment-20833</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/27/pretty-remarkable-thats-an-understatement/#comment-20833</guid>
		<description>NATO has put troops into Afghanistan. So they have put some skin in the game.   Also the French are covertly involved in Algeria and Morrocco, Chad as well.

America would be even more stretched militarily if NATO wasn't heavily involved in the Anti-Taliban effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NATO has put troops into Afghanistan. So they have put some skin in the game.   Also the French are covertly involved in Algeria and Morrocco, Chad as well.</p>
<p>America would be even more stretched militarily if NATO wasn&#8217;t heavily involved in the Anti-Taliban effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rovin</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/27/pretty-remarkable-thats-an-understatement/#comment-20830</link>
		<dc:creator>Rovin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/27/pretty-remarkable-thats-an-understatement/#comment-20830</guid>
		<description>While one Presidential candidate, (John McCain) has the vision to foresee a total marginalization of terrorist activities throughout the region by the use of military strength first, and then diplomatic reconciliation----the other candidate, (Barak Obama) with virtually no foreign policy experience or the resolve to finish off a weakened and leaderless faction of a scattered and battered enemy, has positioned himself to cater to the anti-war radical left who would rather surrender to our enemies abroad.

While most of Europe is standing/sitting on the sidelines watching the U.S. do the "dirty work" they are incapable of, a grateful and sacrificial nation once again rises to the task of providing other nations to achieve the freedom and individual liberty from the tyranny and oppression of a sick and disillusioned society that preys on the weak-------which is this battle against world-wide terrorism. 

Surrender is not an option, and John McCain clearly knows this.

Barak Obama or John McCain? The choice should be crystal clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While one Presidential candidate, (John McCain) has the vision to foresee a total marginalization of terrorist activities throughout the region by the use of military strength first, and then diplomatic reconciliation&#8212;-the other candidate, (Barak Obama) with virtually no foreign policy experience or the resolve to finish off a weakened and leaderless faction of a scattered and battered enemy, has positioned himself to cater to the anti-war radical left who would rather surrender to our enemies abroad.</p>
<p>While most of Europe is standing/sitting on the sidelines watching the U.S. do the &#8220;dirty work&#8221; they are incapable of, a grateful and sacrificial nation once again rises to the task of providing other nations to achieve the freedom and individual liberty from the tyranny and oppression of a sick and disillusioned society that preys on the weak&#8212;&#8212;-which is this battle against world-wide terrorism. </p>
<p>Surrender is not an option, and John McCain clearly knows this.</p>
<p>Barak Obama or John McCain? The choice should be crystal clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/27/pretty-remarkable-thats-an-understatement/#comment-20776</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/27/pretty-remarkable-thats-an-understatement/#comment-20776</guid>
		<description>Wait a sec, Youngstown, Cleveland, Akron...the entire rust belt died in the mid-late 1970's.  NAFTA didn't do it.  

btw, "Pick one, dude. Make the left happy or attack our enemies. You can’t do both."  Oustanding line, but he CAN have it both ways.  YES HE CAN.  Ya gotta have HOPE.  That's all it takes to CHANGE.  He can rant about leaving Iraq till he's elected, then (just as Dems who promised to leave Iraq if elected to Congress) make excuses as to why he can't.  It's been done before, is done now, and will be done in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a sec, Youngstown, Cleveland, Akron&#8230;the entire rust belt died in the mid-late 1970&#8217;s.  NAFTA didn&#8217;t do it.  </p>
<p>btw, &#8220;Pick one, dude. Make the left happy or attack our enemies. You can’t do both.&#8221;  Oustanding line, but he CAN have it both ways.  YES HE CAN.  Ya gotta have HOPE.  That&#8217;s all it takes to CHANGE.  He can rant about leaving Iraq till he&#8217;s elected, then (just as Dems who promised to leave Iraq if elected to Congress) make excuses as to why he can&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s been done before, is done now, and will be done in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/27/pretty-remarkable-thats-an-understatement/#comment-20740</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/02/27/pretty-remarkable-thats-an-understatement/#comment-20740</guid>
		<description>He's also a bullshitter on NAFTA. He's running around in Youngstown blaming job loses on Hillary's NAFTA and then calling the Canadians to tell them he doesn't mean it.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080227/dems_nafta_080227/20080227?hub=CTVNewsAt11


Also He never had any intention to leave Iraq. He's voted against every bill put forward by Feingold and Kerry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s also a bullshitter on NAFTA. He&#8217;s running around in Youngstown blaming job loses on Hillary&#8217;s NAFTA and then calling the Canadians to tell them he doesn&#8217;t mean it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080227/dems_nafta_080227/20080227?hub=CTVNewsAt11" rel="nofollow">http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080227/dems_nafta_080227/20080227?hub=CTVNewsAt11</a></p>
<p>Also He never had any intention to leave Iraq. He&#8217;s voted against every bill put forward by Feingold and Kerry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
