zorro, Bush never said we need to stay in Iraq “for an eternity” or anything like it. Commanders are already evaluting the near future as the military assesses the type of drawdowns we want to leave Iraq to stand on its own.

We all crave Pease, its serenity, and its bliss; however, the passion in power today as in anytime in history attracts a certain life lust, which spans a human dynamism of sexuality that could be argued is the real truth working in parallel to the divine understanding we all seek. Hence what do we have, Race Integration, yet, Ethnic Sovereignty, Now Individual Rights, were history once looked at life in an on going living scale sliding between Piety and Pagan? Or called War and Pease in the life continuum has to deal with the new experiment called the Constitution that does stretch to individual freedoms.

So, what the hell am I saying? Jumping through a lot of racial logic to make a point of failed reciprocity Obama will have a burden to work at, a change we could believe in “”?”” Most certainly should have a question mark at the end of those little political signs.

Our forefather introduced the concept of the separation of church and state, but totally dismissed the ideal of separation of sex and politics. Likely because of that Dynamism of slavery known through the ages exposes a sexual gradient that transcends to manifest an extraordinary random balance in shades of skin color, eye color, vocal tones, a cultural clock connecting perhaps an unknown source of power that resonates the public wondering if good or evil. As an ingredient that plays in a sliding scale of contemporary contextual debate were bad can be convinced to be good and good can be convinced to be bad, were War and Pease in an on going interplay lead and lag both changing places in time. The pace is quickening for we have the Media.

However, with this thing called a Constitution, Americans find themselves needing to line up Good with Good and Bad with Bad for the simple remedy of what looks ass backwards and corrupt as hell right now to figure a way to straighten it out. Simple how do we get rid of the ghetto and blight to transform it to a garden where any color can live in. Attractive enough for whites to go to Negro community as well as whites not to reject the Negro is still the problem.

To rain on the parade of Black History month is not my intention, But, I have a dream too, so why doesn’t my dream get some attention? Is being white doesn’t count as much as an American Negro dream in the well spoken words of all men are created equal. Well, all men are created equal, then my dreams should be just as well to count in the march gathering at great monuments and savored fine gardens designed by inspirational minds and created with sweat reflecting the possible perfection, and order in the environment. Far from the Ghetto where great works have space to take, but have been ignored to leave a trail that seems there is always something that needs to be cleaned up. Iraq is an out rage and the best extreme pitiful example of the current disgusting leadership.

So, in a magnificent sense is Bush correct we need to stay in Iraq for an eternity to see change? But, yet, we have a new comer, Obama, who says we can’t wait, however in his book in the Audacity of Hope, Obama says, he has no clue on how to do this civic change, but will lead us. As hate radio is geared up describing Obama as the Messiah of special acknowledgement in accolades of expressions from a deity to being a cold fish is really something? They are starting to rip Obama apart.

That said, I still would not vote for either of them or anyone in the current Democratic Party.

I’m sure that both their hearts are broken.

As I said, for such an important debate, one would think someone would actually try to write a good story and not just copy/paste. Excuse me for having an opinion about the lack of writing skills and sound byte mannerisms of modern journalism.

That said, I still would not vote for either of them or anyone in the current Democratic Party.

And I did read the article. I noted that proper decriptive papers, such as journalism once might have been, do not just end.

Wire service stories have always been specifically designed so that they might be truncated at any point to fit a newspaper’s space requirements, so: wrong again.

Sorry, I don’t read anything from the San Fran Chronicle anymore than you would The Weekly Standard. Try another source?

An admission of stunning intellectual laziness! At least you have the moxie to admit it, though.

The topic was what Hillary Clinton said about Obama, not what conservatives say. If you have issues with it, then take it up with her.

And I did read the article. I noted that proper decriptive papers, such as journalism once might have been, do not just end. There should be a summary at the end. The article looked like someone at Yahoo did a sloppy cut and paste job and missed the last few paragraphs.

Sorry, I don’t read anything from the San Fran Chronicle anymore than you would The Weekly Standard. Try another source?

Oh, you want links? This guy has a smarter take on this thing than a whole deck full of flopping, floundering aces.

I am not sure that is a good way to end a story since there is no summarization, but it is the AP after all. Accuracy and completeness are not their hallmarks.

What does a summary have to do with accuracy? Nothing, of course. And completeness? Maybe the author was assuming–obviously incorrectly though that might have been–that you would understand the main points of the article after having–oh, I don’t know–read the article.

We saw how well that worked out in the Soviet Union.