Got it. I made the assumption that it was the combination of those two. However your statement was, indeed, more precice.

Besides, even the NYT editor thinks it was BS. The only person who seems to find substance and value to the front page gossip column was Dan Rather

Scott’s reply:
No Steve. It’s about John McCain, and it’s about the allegations of infidelity+improper ethics

???????

“(By the way, Democratic politicians do get divorced as well, I do not wish to paint Democrats as in any way “Holier than Thou” – That is a Republican perogative).”

Yeah, right. If your statement were true, then there’d be an equal or greater amount of comment about Democrats/Republicans rather than all Republican and a caveat about Dems. So sad.

Point remains, I said that I didn’t think Hillary would dare comment on the allegations of infidelity or corruption, and I was right. She didn’t. My guess would be because she has millions of pages of scandal investigation to herself, and is still awaiting the sentencing from the 3 judge panel on her penalty for the worst Senate financing scandal ever. Lucky for her 2 of the judges were appointed by her husband, and they likely won’t post a verdict until replaced by the next president.

Too bad you tried to go the faux bi-partisan route Steve. I applaud the sentiment, but if you mean it, you’d demonstrate it instead of just toss in a weak caveat. C’mon man, you’re alllllllmost there. Just for fun, see if you can make a post that attacks both sides as equally as you claim they deserve. You can do it!

??????

Senator Clinton did not comment about the allegations because (IMO) that is the right thing to say, given that they are just allegations. Besides, I do not recall anywhere in this thread making any prediction, one way or the other, about what she would or would not say.

My points regarding the story about John McCain as it relates to Senator Hillary Clinton are two:
> When confronted with her husband’s infidelity, they went through counseling and kept their marriage together. This is something that Conservatives would normally encourage. In fact the “Family Values” Party insists that keeping a marriage together is paramount. Except, of course when it comes to the Clintons, in which case Conservatives are aghast that they did not divorce, just like John McCain, Newt Gingrich, Fred Thompson, Rudi Guiliani, Ronald Reagan and Bob Dole. (By the way, Democratic politicians do get divorced as well, I do not wish to paint Democrats as in any way “Holier than Thou” – That is a Republican perogative).

> The thread was about the John McCain story. Launching into a “Let’s hate Hillary” line was off-topic. Had I gone off topic, I would have been threatened with having my posts deleted (and have had them deleted in the past). But, of course, this being a “Conservative Site”, “Hate Hillary” is ALWAYS on topic, because Conservatives appear to thrive on that hate. So, naturally, none of the moderators who would normally be posting “off topic” warnings said one single warning about it. And none of them ever will.

Sorry Steve. You’re on the wrong side of the truth once again.

As always, the NYTimes is its own worst enemy.

For years and years the pictures of McCain with a vein bulging in his neck or a scowl on his face have been trumpted as proof that he is mentally unstable.

This stupid trash from the Times is working to bolster support for McCain to the level that even Rush has come to his defense. Thank you Mr. Keller!

Despite problems, they have managed to keep their marriage together. Isn’t that what Family Value Conservatives believe in? Don’t you believe that couples should try to stay together, if they can?

Re: “And I am not mad that they are together still, just a little confused by her “Standing by her Man”.”

Maybe they still love each other? Or does The Party not permit Conservatives to believe that?

And wasn’t this thread about the allegations of an affair and favoritism on the part of John McCain? Or is that not revelant since it was Conservatives that went off topic?

Sorry but i like to think for myself and not what others have to say. If you look at their marriage how can anyone tell me that it is nothing but a farce. he sleeps around all the time and has had many females accuse him of sexual abuse. Then he sends Hillary after them. That sounds like love to me, or maybe they are just swingers. Who knows?? Maybe they do love each other, very strange way of showing it though. And I am not mad that they are together still, just a little confused by her “Standing by her Man”.

oh well, enough of feeding the troll.