From the Associated Press: “Sen. Barack Obama swept the Louisiana primary and caucuses in Nebraska and Washington state Saturday night, slicing into Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s slender delegate lead in their historic race for the Democratic presidential nomination. The Illinois senator also won caucuses in the Virgin Islands, completing his best night of the campaign.”

Meanwhile: Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., wipes her eye as she listens to a disabled U.S. veteran in the audience tell his story during a campaign stop at The City of Lewiston Memorial Armory in Lewiston, Maine., Saturday, Feb. 9, 2008.”

And let’s not forget that Mike Huckabee embarrassed John McCain by besting him by nearly 3-1 in Kansas, and a narrow win in Louisiana. McCain is currently leading in the Washington State caucus, but by the narrowest of margins and more people are voting for a combination of Romney and uncommitted rather than McCain.

Check CNN or Politico for updated results.

McCain’s weakness in these contests is further proof of conservative disquiet over his nomination. Apparently, his speech on Thursday to the Conservative Political Action Conference won’t be enough to convince conservatives that he is one of us.

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Saturday, February 9th, 2008 at 9:14 pm and is filed under The Clintons. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

13 comments so far

Curt
 1Reply to this comment  

What a wacky primary on both sides. Just crazy.

Not happy about Hillary faring poorly also.

February 9th, 2008 at 9:35 pm
 2Reply to this comment  

One the one hand, I would like to see the Clintons repudiated and defeated by their own party. That would be SWEEEETT!

But I realize that Obama as the Dem nominee would be harder for McCain to beat.

February 9th, 2008 at 10:20 pm
 3Reply to this comment  

He is one of us. Nobody owns him, though, and that’s what has people ticked off. McCain isn’t just the only real hawk in the race; he’s been so all along, when all the other Republicans were keeping their mouths shut about the war. He’s done the same thing about fiscal issues.

But Huckabee, beyond abortion and gay marriage, he’s completely left-wing. Every single issue, as liberal as Hillary. Take away the accent, and he’s indistinguishable from Bloomberg.

Voting for Huckabee cannot be construed as a rejection of McCain *by conservatives*.

February 10th, 2008 at 5:36 am
bbartlog
 4Reply to this comment  

Luckily for McCain the Louisiana primary ended up having no effect. If Huckabee had gotten 51% of the primary vote he could have locked up some delegates, but with everyone under 50% it’s just a beauty contest. The Washington state caucus victory is almost as useless; those 18 delegates will actually be elected at the state convention in May, and in the unlikely event that there is still doubt about McCain’s nomination at that point it’s likely that Huckabee and Paul could make a deal to freeze out McCain (given his thin margin of victory).

February 10th, 2008 at 8:00 am
jainphx
 5Reply to this comment  

You can’t embarrass some one who has no shame.

February 10th, 2008 at 8:10 am
 6Reply to this comment  

bbartlog: It’s all about perception. And the perception is that a significant segment of the GOP isn’t swallowing the McCool Aid.

February 10th, 2008 at 8:13 am
 7Reply to this comment  

According to the leftoid media this weekend McCain was embarrased, humiliated, hit a detour, and flunked—-while Hillary just managed to get swept by Obama—–again with little or no adjectives or pronouns available to enhance their “journalistic” skills when it comes to writing about Mrs. Clinton. Unabated Bias

February 10th, 2008 at 8:33 am
Igor R.
 8Reply to this comment  

Obama is more dangerous than Hillary. He is more committed to withdrawing the troops from Iraq immediately, he is supported by muslim groups, and his inexperience combined with having to stay SOMEWHAT true to his rhetoric if elected will lead him to do irretrievable damage to the United States. Also don’t forget that his Senate campaign was largely financed and supported by Soros. His habit of not saying anything but saying it well doesn’t bode well for a good outcome. This weird election season is leading us towards a very unpleasant outcome. Unfortunately, the electorate has gotten too “innocent” because they have not seen ANYONE’S policies result in widespread devastation in a long time. I just saw Eisenhower’s granddaughter come out in support of Obama because he will unify the country. I’m afraid America is about to lose it’s naivite.

February 10th, 2008 at 9:09 am
 9Reply to this comment  

Obama would be much more difficult for McCain to beat. So what if he is an empty suit with dangerous foreign policy ideas and the total nightmare of socialist/class warfare economics. He’s the latest media darling and is just so exciting for new voters.

Meanwhile, did you folks see the story that the “Obama Girl” who was all the rage on the internet didn’t even bother voting for him in New York?

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/06/obama-girl-didnt-vote/

February 10th, 2008 at 10:33 am
Igor R.
 10Reply to this comment  

Mike I actually don’t think it’s possible to predict who is more difficult to beat. While today the polls favor Obama, he is a mirage and he also attracts some of the Republican crossover anti-Hillary vote. If it’s McCain vs. Obama, I think it depends more on the factors we can’t fully predict today (like McCain’s health or foreign policy developments) and how well the Obama mirage can withstand the passage of time and the lack of a Democratic opponent. Also, Bill Clinton and those who interpreted his “fightin’ words” to benefit Obama has radicalized Obama’s base. What will happen to all of that by the end of summer is anyone’s guess.

February 10th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
jainphx
 11Reply to this comment  

Igor- Amen.

February 10th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
 12Reply to this comment  

Igor: I agree that Obama is a mirage. But to a significant segment of the electorate that is so disaffected he is like the mirage promising an oasis of change.

He doesn’t have to be real. It’s not a rational thought process.

Obama has been remarkably effective in blunting Hillary’s criticism and playing to his mirage. And the image of an old John McCain next to a young Obama is also one you cannot ignore.

Yes, there are many unknown dynamics that will shape the campaign as it unfolds. But as I look at it now, Obama has the edge. Since he has no real record, he can be all things to all people.

February 10th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
 13Reply to this comment  

P.S. If you want to read about Obama as the Second Coming of Christ:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23182456-28737,00.html

February 10th, 2008 at 10:51 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: