6
Feb

After “Math” of GOP Super Tuesday

Posted by: Mike's America @ 9:27 pm in Politics  | 0 views

They call it After “Math” for a reason!

And those numbers aren’t good for Mitt Romney. Mitt needed California on Super Tuesday and while opinion polls predicted he might win California, McCain snagged nearly every delegate in the Golden State with a 42% win compared to Mitt Romney’s 34%. This was in line with trends across the country except in Moutain Western states and Massachusetts.

Due to differences in interpreting state party rules for awarding delegates, nearly every major news organization shows a different delegate count for the GOP race (NYTimes, NBC, Wash. Post, Real Clear Politics ).

However, one truth is undeniable: McCain now has a commanding lead ranging anywhere from the NY Times 689 to NBC’s 720 delegates won out of a total of 1,191 needed for the nomination. Romney’s total ranges from 244 to 312.

21 states and the District of Columbia have yet to hold a primary and the available pool of GOP delegates in those contests (again, open to some interpretation) range from 963 to 1264.

Old Washington insider, Charlie Black, a senior adviser to McCain put it this way:

The remaining contests account for roughly 963 delegates. For Mitt Romney to match our delegate count, he would have to win more than 50 percent of those delegates. And, he would have to win nearly every single delegate still available in order to become the nominee. And, many of these contests are proportional, so Mitt will have to win by big margins in many states to garner every last delegate. For example, in this weekend’s Louisiana primary, he would have to win the with more than 50 percent of the vote in order to win (1191 delegates to win, 963+236=1,199).
With Mike Huckabee still a factor in this race, particularly in the South, and many contests moving forward proportional, the math is nearly impossible for Mitt Romney to win the nomination.

McCain needs only get one third of the remaining delegates to cinch the nomination on the first ballot. It’s unlikely at this point that the Stop McCain movement has enough gas left in the tank to prevent that from happening.

The next move is up to Romney and his speech Thursday at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington will be closely watched by all with an interest in this race.

Meanwhile McCain will also address CPAC after snubbing the group last year. He understands that without conservative support it’s hard to see how he could win a general election. GOP strategist Greg Mueller summed up the importance of conservatives in the general election: “the conservative base is made up of those people who go out and knock on doors and make phone calls for the nominee. You need their enthusiastic support to win.”

And McCain has made a career out of sticking it to conservatives. Again, I’ll remind readers what McCain told me personally in November when I asked him about conservative disagreements with him on issues. He said directly that if we disagreed with him on the issues raised in that meeting that we conservatives “shoud not vote for him…. I’m not your candidate” he said.

Now of course not only is McCain asking us to vote for him, but to help him win. I figure that the libs and moderates who supported him and didn’t even bother to show themselves before he started to win can carry the water on this one. After all, they believe as McCain does in manmade global warming, preventing the “torture” of monsters intent on killing thousands of Americans and bringing Gitmo terrorists to the U.S. and granting them full Constitutional rights.

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 6th, 2008 at 9:27 pm and is filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

15 comments so far

 1Reply to this comment  

However, one truth is undeniable: McCain now has a commanding lead ranging anywhere from the NY Times 689 to NBC’s 720 delegates won out of a total of 1,191 needed for the nomination. Romney’s total ranges from 244 to 312.

This is the media’s newest addition to what they call accurate news—–like the pollsters, they are within the margin of error. Actual numbers would require a “journalist” to think and that’s not resonable to assume they have this ability.

February 7th, 2008 at 4:25 am
jainphx
 2Reply to this comment  

Journalist THINK, hell our own party doesn’t think. So many fell into trap that McCain was only one who could beat Hillery. Truth is he’s the only one that would and will lose to her taking the Congress and senate with him down the tubes. We are in for a long 4 years. I just hope I live to see the correction that is inevitable.

February 7th, 2008 at 6:17 am
 3Reply to this comment  

Hey Folks… I looked at this from a variety of sources as you can see. It’s just undeniable that McCain is WAYYY ahead in delegates beating Romney by more than 2 to 1.

February 7th, 2008 at 7:18 am
bbartlog
 4Reply to this comment  

Actual numbers would require a “journalist” to think

Maybe you’d like to do the research and come up with an accurate figure? Believe me, the reason these estimates vary is not because journalists are lazy (though I’m sure they are). The problem is that
– the rules are complicated
– everyone wants a delegate estimate once a caucus has been held, even if things are really still undecided
– even if you had the twenty or thirty hours you’d need to spend on the research, some needed information simply isn’t available (i.e. the actual candidate supported by some nominally uncommitted delegates in various states).

For example, Maine, Nevada, Minnesota and Louisiana are all considered to have had their caucuses, and most news organizations will show you (national) delegate counts for those states. But in all those places all that’s happened is that delegates to a *state* convention have been elected (and a straw poll conducted alongside). The delegates to the national convention will be chosen at the state convention. To figure out who *those* delegates will support, you would need to know the procedures of the state conventions: do they have one up or down vote on a national delegate slate? Does each area of the state get allocated some number of delegates to the national convention (this is how it works in Louisiana)? Do they have some other way of trying to make the representation proportional? And also: did the delegates that got elected to the state convention get elected in proportion to the percentage of the popular vote received? In Maine and Louisiana, you have two sort of opposite situations with respect to Ron Paul’s state delegates. In Louisiana, Paul’s people mobilized pretty well and had a plurality of support in several districts, but the LA GOP was able to run a unity slate of sorts and thus keep Paul’s take of delegates to the state convention down to 15 out of 105 or so. On the other hand, in Maine, Paul’s actual take of the vote was only 20%, but thanks to good organization he was able to capture about 35% of the state delegates.

February 7th, 2008 at 9:00 am
 5Reply to this comment  

Truth is he’s the only one that would and will lose to her taking the Congress and senate with him down the tubes

And you are basing this “truth” on what? —–your emotions? Your total disdain for McCain? The latest RCP shows that if Clinton or Obama were to run against Romney, he would lose by over 10% points. At least McCain is in the plus column. Nothing will unite this party more than if Clinton is the nominee, which will bring out the base in full force. That my dear jainphx
is how REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES will defeat Clinton. If you continue to contribute to the nightmare of a Democratic President because you refuse to back the eventual Republican nominee, then you reap what you sow.

February 7th, 2008 at 9:08 am
bbartlog
 6Reply to this comment  

Image test post:

Sorry about the clutter, just want to see if this will work (I know typepad will zero this out).

February 7th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
Curt
 7Reply to this comment  

You have to use the [img src=] tag BB, not the [a href=]

February 7th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
 8Reply to this comment  

Wordsmith was showing off. And proving that he can do more than DANCE!

February 7th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
bbartlog
 9Reply to this comment  

Thanks for the advice! Second try:

February 7th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
bbartlog
 10Reply to this comment  

I imagine that if just anyone could post images wherever they liked, porn spammers (not to mention trolls) would have a field day.. so I shouldn’t be surprised that blogger strips them out -

February 7th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
ChrisG
 11Reply to this comment  

Bbartlog,

Looking at the Second Try, there does not seem to be anything following the colon. When I view it on the admin page, nothing is there.

I will insert your picture below.

(img src=” “) works so I think you might have hit enter/submit comment before you inserted the image.

February 7th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
 12Reply to this comment  

yes, people could post really tasteless stuff:

February 7th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
bbartlog
 13Reply to this comment  

(img src=” “) works so I think you might have hit enter/submit comment before you inserted the image.

I’m pretty sure I put it in and Blogger stripped it out. I might try some other permutations later just to see if I’m being clueless – maybe I didn’t close tags and got things taken out for that reason. But I think the simple explanation (blogger is set up to stop random yahoos from posting images because that would cause a ton of problems) is probably correct.

February 7th, 2008 at 2:21 pm
 14Reply to this comment  

If you are trying to hotlink images from blogger.com… they won’t work.

February 7th, 2008 at 2:43 pm
 15Reply to this comment  

yes, people could post really tasteless stuff:

Priceless Mike!

February 7th, 2008 at 5:23 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: