12
Jan

Santorum & Gerson On McCain

Posted by: Curt @ 3:09 pm in Politics  | 0 views

Hugh Hewitt interviewed Rick Santorum and Michael Gerson today and what they have to say about McCain is an eye-opener. Santorum was in the Senate with McCain for many years:

When Santorum says that “we’re looking at the media trying to make Barack Obama the president, and make John McCain the shill for him,” and “I think they know that John McCain can’t win this election,” he is exactly on target.

When Santorum says of McCain that on “the environment, he’s absolutely terrible. He buys into the complete left wing environmentalist movement in this country,” he is speaking from Republican Caucus experience.

When Santorum says that about the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill that “John McCain was the guy who was working with Ted Kennedy to drive it down our throats, and lectured us repeatedly about how xenophobic we were, lectured us, us being the Republican conference, about how wrong we were on this, how we were on the wrong side of history,” he was there, heard those lectures.

When Michael Gerson says that “I think the main policy problem John McCain has is that I don’t think there’s much evidence that he’s a convert on the pro-growth economic philosophy,” and adds that “[w]hen he opposed the Bush tax cuts, it wasn’t just that there was not offsets, and not sufficient cuts,” remember that Gerson was at George W. Bush’s side through those battles. Gerson remembers that McCain “used our class warfare arguments, ‘It’ll only benefit the top 1%’ and other things,” and concluded “I don’t think he buys the kind of supply side ideology that has really determined American economic policies the last 25 years, particularly under both Reagan and the current President Bush.”

Now before you say Santorum is a shill for Romney, as Hugh is, read this:

HH: We’ve got about 30 seconds, Senator Santorum. Have you sensed today the conservative movement waking up to its peril?

RS: I guess my answer is yes, but I also…a lot of folks are throwing up their hands, not sure in what direction to go. That’s the problem.

HH: The direction’s toward Romney, isn’t it?

RS: I don’t know. I mean, I’ve got…I mean, I could have a whole long discussion on Romney and my concerns with him, too.

And to be fair Gerson had a few nice things to say on McCain also:

MG: But you know, McCain, though, to be fair, I believe on social policy and on judges has been conventionally conservative over the years. He has a pretty good record in the same way that Bob Dole had a pretty good record, not that he looks like he’s deeply engaged in these issues. I don’t know how much he cares about them. But he’s generally voted the right way.

HH: Well, you just mentioned the D word, Bob Dole. And I get the sense that we’re getting fed another Bob Dole, that we’re being rushed to a John McCain candidacy that will represent exactly what Bob Dole did in 1996, which is the oldest guy in the room, has been around the longest, gets to get the Republican nomination, even though it means certain electoral doom.

MG: Right. Well, I’ve known both of them. I worked for Dole in ’96 in the doomed campaign. But I think that John McCain has stronger political skills than Bob Dole does. I think he does have the ability to reach out to independents who like…

So it wasn’t all bash McCain day, but the worries of Santorum and Gerson should not be taken lightly.

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post

Tags: , , ,

This entry was posted on Saturday, January 12th, 2008 at 3:09 pm and is filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

12 comments so far

Igor R.
 1Reply to this comment  

Amazingly, even here we see posts all the time saying things that “McCain is OK”, “I could vote for him”. Are these people idiots? Are they liberals playing games? Some deny it. There is no way to like McCain unless you bought both into Amnesty and Global Warming.

January 12th, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Philadelphia Steve
 2Reply to this comment  

As somone who has watched Rick Santorum for years, I would say that you should not accept his opinion on anying, positive or negative.

He is the man who held a national press conference in 2006, declaring that the WMD’s “had been found”. Only to be rebutted by the Pentagon within hours because the “WMD’s” were only old, non-working artillery shells from the Reagan era that have been publicly known for years.

With his track record, I would recommend you get a second opinion if Rick Santorum said the sun was hot.

January 12th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
 3Reply to this comment  

When a fool reccomends no one listen to Santorum. It only strengthens Santorum’s point of view.

Thanks Philly Steve. You’re the best advertisement for conservatives we have.

January 12th, 2008 at 8:18 pm
KB
 4Reply to this comment  

I heard the Santorum interview and he made some good points. McCain is not a classic conservative. Of course, none of the other nominees are either with the exception of Fred Thompson. HH and Mark Levin are going after McCain aggressively now, but if it is McCain versus Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, is there really an argument? That is, how do conservatives vote if our choice is McCain or Clinton? McCain or Obama?

January 12th, 2008 at 9:33 pm
Igor R.
 5Reply to this comment  

Any of the Republicans are better than Hillary or Obama. For that matter Hillary is better than Obama if only because Soros is currently backing him and has been his sponsor from the beginning (of course the full extent of Hillary’s Chinese connection isn’t known). Obama’s voting record is slightly more radical than Hillary’s, especially if you take his abstentions into account.

But asking if you’re rather vote for McCain/Huckabee than Hillary/Obama is like asking do you prefer to be paralyzed or die from cancer? It’s not a pleasant choice, and you have to live with the conserquences of the first alternative for a long time. Why not stay healthy and vote for Fred?

January 12th, 2008 at 9:48 pm
Skip
 6Reply to this comment  

When I heard these comments what I initially thought was ‘where the heck was this Santorum during the Specter/Toomey race?’

If this Santorum had existed back then, sure, Specter might not be in the Senate, but Santorum probably still would be.

January 12th, 2008 at 10:03 pm
jainphx
 7Reply to this comment  

Santorum has no use for McCain,but then again anyone who has ever had dealings with the man have no use for him. Show me one Senator that has endorsed him. Listen to what’s not being said about McShamnisty, it tells a tale.

January 12th, 2008 at 10:06 pm
jainphx
 8Reply to this comment  

Lindsey Grahm doesn’t count.

January 12th, 2008 at 10:08 pm
John Ryan
 9Reply to this comment  

People forget that the President of the United States is determined not by whom the Republicans vote fo,r or by whom the Democrats vote for. It is determined by the Independents.
The majority of the Independents seem to be choosing the Democrats lately.

January 13th, 2008 at 8:23 am
Philadelphia Steve
 10Reply to this comment  

Re: “That is, how do conservatives vote if our choice is McCain or Clinton? McCain or Obama?”

Conservatives will vote for whomever the Republican Party nominates. No matter who, where or when.

While ther were “Reagan Democrats”, Conservatives have no such contingent: They are irretrievable peldged to vote Republican. Now and forever.

There is no need to debate that point.

January 14th, 2008 at 8:53 am
Philadelphia Steve
 11Reply to this comment  

Re: ” (of course the full extent of Hillary’s Chinese connection isn’t known). ”

Which means that it does not exist.

Except that in Conservative-land, lack of proof is considered conclusive evidence, which is why they all believe in Creationism.

January 14th, 2008 at 8:56 am
Philadelphia Steve
 12Reply to this comment  

Re: “When I heard these comments what I initially thought was ‘where the heck was this Santorum during the Specter/Toomey race?’
If this Santorum had existed back then, sure, Specter might not be in the Senate, but Santorum probably still would be.”

Rich Santorum has been in Congress (either in the House or Senate) since he was a protoge of Newt Gingrich in 1992. He endorsed Arlan Specter unconditionally in every election in which he stood.

January 14th, 2008 at 8:58 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: