Stop The Flight 93 Memorial Blogburst: Murdoch Design Violates Entry Requirement

Defenders of the crescent design for the Flight 93 memorial describe
the landform around the crash site as a bowl shape that fairly dictates
the use of a crescent design. On the Mike and Juliet Morning Show,
Memorial Project Chairman John Reynolds was asked by host Mike Jerrick: “Why couldn’t you just use some other shape?”

Reynolds cupped his hands together for the audience and insisted that the design had to be a crescent:

Because, if you do this with you hands, this is the land there. This bowl is America holding its heroes.

But in fact, the site is not a bowl shape at all, as one can tell by looking at the topo lines on the site plan. The land slopes continually from north-northwest to south-southeast: (click for enlarged picture)

The
Sacred Ground Plaza that marks the crash site sits between the crescent
tips (above the 4). 20 feet of elevation per topo line.

Instead
of following the rim of a bowl, the crescent starts on a ridgeline
above the crash site and circles around to well below it, passing
across the middle of a wetland that sits about 70 vertical feet below
the crash site.

Not only is the crash site not a bowl, but the
crescent actually does not fit the natural landform at all. Of all the
designs entered in the design competition, Paul Murdoch’s Crescent of
Embrace is the only one that that fails to meet the Memorial Project’s
single stated physical requirement: that design entries should “respect
the rural landscape.” (Scroll down to “purpose.”)

To create the full arc of the crescent, a raised causeway will have to be filled in across the wetlands that collect about half-way out the lower crescent arm:

This filling in of the wetlands would never be allowed in a private project. There are environmental laws against it.

To
sneak his design past the requirement to leave the landscape
undisturbed, Murdoch played a very clever trick. His preliminary
Crescent of Embrace design did not build a causeway across the
wetlands. It only showed a quarter circle of red maple walkway, with a
natural footpath skirting around the bottom of the wetlands area
instead of crossing it:

This original crescent design
already had the flight path breaking the circle, turning it into what
was called from the start the Crescent of Embrace, so it seems that
Murdoch had in mind from the beginning to memorialize the terrorists’ circle-breaking/ crescent-creating feat. He could well have had the basic geometry of his full terrorist memorial mosque
already worked out, but he knew that he would never make the first cut
if he broke the competition’s one rule and violated the wetlands, so he
only showed a little bit of crescent, and had his innocuous looking
footpath skirt the wetlands.

To turn his preliminary design
into a full Islamic crescent, Murdoch needed to build his causeway. How
did he justify this violation of the wetlands? With typical brass,
declaring that the causeway created a “healing landscape”:

Here
visitors will be most aware of continuously connected living systems as
the circular path literally bridges the hydrology of the Bowl. [“Wetlands,” p. 5.]

The
highway department should hire this guy for P.R.. He could sell the
environmentalists on how close a new road will bring them to nature.
Why, they will be “literally bridging it!” What could be better? Good
pitch. The Memorial Project bought it.

Most remarkable is
Patrick White, vice president of Families of Flight 93. In private
conversation at the Memorial Project’s July 2007 meeting, White told
one of Alec Rawls’s compatriots that an expensive drainage system had been developed for the crescent design and that no other design could work on the site because this elaborate drainage system would only work with the crescent design.

Duh. The crescent design is the only design out of all thousand submitted that needs
a drainage system. Every other design left the wetland untouched, as
the Memorial Project had asked. Yet these people all really seem to
mean it when they insist that this is the only design that fits the
land.

Didn’t they notice that not one of the other thousand
designs was a crescent? How could that be, if the landform really
dictated a crescent? How did they get so wrapped in the emotion of the
crescent’s “healing embrace” that they can’t see anything else?

Because Paul Murdoch is an artistic genius who had these grieving people in the palms of his hands. The man is diabolical!

(via Cao’s Blog and Error Theory)