Comments on: Bhutto Names Man Who Killed Osama bin Laden?

By: Chase Martin

Chase Martin — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:52:35 +0000

Bin Laden died not long after he released a video denying his involvement in 911. All video and audio after that are fake.

Fox News article says Bin Laden dead in December 2001
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html

FBI says Osama Bin Laden NOT wanted for 911 (fake CIA tapes aren’t admissible in court)
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm

MIT has found that Tin Hats enhance government’s invasive abilities:
http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/

The last link is satirical.

I wonder who would pretend to be Bin Laden, accept responsibility for 911 (when the real Bin Laden denied it) and try to help Bush win 2004 election:
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2004/10/29/binladen_message041029.html

By: Getting By

Getting By — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:35:47 +0000

Seems like the disconcern for what she said amongst the general joe public is not only from lack of exposure to this sort of stuff but most Americans deep embedded pride for their country which seems to include their government some of the time. There are alot of people ready to go to fists over negative government wordage. Whether it be a party line thing or not, who knows? I don’t like getting caught up in the perpetual debate of he said she said and this is justified and this isn’t. I do, on the other hand, take all info available to me and form my own feelings. As of right now, I feel as though that if this were true, and Bin Laden was not alive do to being murdered, and other countries have known or other groups do know, I WON’T BE A BIT SURPRISED! One person in my life right now that I know got into conversation about whether or not the war in Iraq is still justified. She said that even if we were lied to about our reasons and we were there to do nothing more than shake crap up and get oil control, then good, because it would be good for America. That scares me that a person can take all things into account and still put the baby powder on poop to make it smell good.

By: John

John — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:58:05 +0000

I have a pretty big tinfoil hat but this story appear to be the result of a brain fart on Bhutto’s part. She gave interviews before to the India Times in June and the day after the Frost interview to CNN where she said or implied that Bin Laden was still alive.

Since the videos of him are obvious fakes and I don’t think Pakistani caves come equipped with hemodialysis machines, I happen not to believe her.

By: davboz

davboz — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:32:58 +0000

Osama may or may NOT be dead.
CIA may or may NOT know which.
These, i don’t think, are the crucial points.(Though they may POINT to crucial points.)
Bhutto’s expression & body language tells me she misspoke.
As to what she meant, that depends on which story she believed or presented.Maybe meant “killed Daniel Pearl for OBL”.Maybe something else.But she misspoke, I’d say, for sure.SHE would not have been one of the few among all people, to know exactly the nature of those details.She would not have been privy to or in a position to know.
–PS–How is it hard for one to find something on Omar Shiekh?
Now,unraveling just what HE really has done and when,among the differing versions, THAT is another story.

By: Curt

Curt — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:27:28 +0000

An Alex Jones nutjob telling me to grow up….rofl.

Keep your tinhat to yourself please.

By: A. Patriot

A. Patriot — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:25:03 +0000

Grow up. Conspiracies happen. Watch Aaron Russo’s ‘Freedom to Fascism’, and see one reason of many why Ron Paul thinks there is America is being threatened with a mild form of fascism (defined by Mousillini as an unholy alliance between government and industry. In this film, Nick Rockefeller told Russo that there would be an ‘event’, and people would be looking through caves for terrorists that didn’t exist, and the whole thing would be a hoax. Don’t believe in conspiracies? Here’s another part of the “open conspiracy” to destroy the U.S. (for beginners). This from David Rockefeller’s Memoirs:

Ã¢â‚¬Å“For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” Ã¢â‚¬” (David Rockefeller, Memoirs, p.405).

Grow up, get educated, and assume the role of informed an informed citizen who was intended to run this country by our founding fathers. Read about Carol Quigley, Bill Clinton’s mentor, for example.

Check Alex Jone’s reports on how recent Al-Queda tapes featured an Al-Queda logo that an expert says was put on at the same time as the logo for a U.S. security firm. Marvel at how his beard had darkened up in a recent tape, with the same exact background and even clothes, as a tape released when he was much younger. When video forgeries began to be detected, he then supposedly began releasing audio tapes. The sources of these communications are never given. Do we need to go so far as to assume they got some impostor imitated his voice, or is it enough to observe the above facts, coupled with the fact that none of the recent Bin Laden tapes mention any events of recent years?

* sigh *

By: Joanie

Joanie — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:15:08 +0000

She also mentioned that she suspected Bin Laden’s son of wanting to kill her. If she had misspoken about Bin Laden, meaning Daniel Pearl or someone else, why would she not mention Bin Laden in connection with wanting to kill her? Why his son?

I think that he is dead, and they have found a voicesimilar enough to his voice and speech patterns to read ‘his’ diatribes. The tape quality is always poor.

By: Ali

Ali — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:07:49 +0000

Don’t know, but go back to the video of what happened… you never know:

The Journalist and The Jihadi Part 1 (additional links for following there)

http://video.google.com/url?docid=1571975579053457273&esrc=sr2&ev=v&len=0&q=the%2Bjournalist%2Band%2Bthe%2Bjihadi&srcurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymotion.com%2Fvideo%2Fx10lnm_the-journalist-and-the-jihadi-part_news&vidurl=%2Fvideoplay%3Fdocid%3D1571975579053457273%26q%3Dthe%2Bjournalist%2Band%2Bthe%2Bjihadi%26total%3D166%26start%3D0%26num%3D10%26so%3D0%26type%3Dsearch%26plindex%3D1&usg=AL29H21QCH4SX9qwRG-sBGbTvf3nnSAnYg

By: Wikistan

Wikistan — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:21:25 +0000

Yeah, the guy who killed Osama bin Laden, I mean, Daniel Pearl

Probably misspoken, but interesting nonetheless. Did Bhutto treat us all to one final intrigue?
…

By: jainphx

jainphx — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:26:50 +0000

I don’t think she could have misspoke this badly. I’ve thought for some time that he is dead, just to many reasons to innumerate.