This guy is unbelievable.
Remember the report Mike posted on yesterday about the 400 scientists who dismiss the man-made global warming hysteria. Here is Gore’s answer: (h/t Newsbusters)
After a quick review of the report, Gore spokeswoman Kalee Kreider said 25 or 30 of the scientists may have received funding from Exxon Mobil Corp.
Exxon Mobil spokesman Gantt H. Walton dismissed the accusation, saying the company is concerned about climate-change issues and does not pay scientists to bash global-warming theories.
In typical Clintonian fashion he attempts to discredit those who disagree with him to deflect the attention away from the real story. That being the fact that the debate is NOT over, nor should it ever be over. Science doesn’t work that way.
Even more disturbing, as Noel Sheppard brings up, the man has made a ton of money off of the global warming hysteria:
Pretty amazing coming from a man that likely has made what some
estimate is $100 million in the past seven years selling this canard to
the public
But lets look at those who agree with Gore’s position. You think any of them are funded by some big liberal organizations like the Soros Foundation, Think Progress, Media Matters, Greenpeace and the like?
You bet your ass they are funded by these groups.
See author page
Oh I see the link. You see big oil paid taxes. Some of that tax money went to pay those scientists. Therefore big oil did fund those statements.
That group also paid Al Gore’s salary when he was in office and now with his pension. Big oil also funded, through taxes, the scientists that blamed global warming on humans. Now can we say big oil funds Al Gore’s rant on global warming?
Curt,
I’m not a scientist but there is a simple test to put the lie to the global warming thingie.
Every weather station in the world has historical highs and lows for every day of the year going back for however long that station has been in existence.
On any given day the high and low temperature recorded that day is the highest, lowest or somewhere in between historical records for that day.
There has to be a way to count the number of record highs and lows (normalized for the number of years that station has been in existence) recorded by state, region, country or continent in any given month, quarter, season or year.
If there is global warming then the hockey stick effect would show the number of record highs increasing and the number of record lows decreasing. DUH!
Even Gore could compile this data. Could it be that this simple test disproves his premise?
Why are the motives of scientists questioned, along with the source of funding, when they support a skeptical view on the alarmism surrounding global warming; and never the motives of those scientists whose research funding is fueled by those with a stake in the belief of the alarmist vision of climate change?
Scenes from the Climate Inquisition: