Comments on: The “Consensus” On Global Warming Inside the IPCC Report http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/ Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:12:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » » Don’t Agree On Global Warming? Go To Jail! http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-15266 Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » » Don’t Agree On Global Warming? Go To Jail! Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:07:49 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-15266 [...] fact is there is NO consensus on man-made global warming. The debate is NOT over, nor should it ever be. Which [...] [...] fact is there is NO consensus on man-made global warming. The debate is NOT over, nor should it ever be. Which [...]

]]> By: Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » » Global Warming: Case Closed? http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-14559 Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » » Global Warming: Case Closed? Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:09:58 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-14559 [...] Long live freedom! As long as your doing and paying what we tell you. The source is here. [...] [...] Long live freedom! As long as your doing and paying what we tell you. The source is here. [...]

]]> By: ChrisG http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-9599 ChrisG Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:53:32 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-9599 I looked into wind and solar systems for my home in Michigan. Neither are rated to work well her and both cost huge amounts of money for almost no return in this area. Now if the new nano-carbon tube systems are reliable and cheaper.. then maybe. But nothing for the near future. I looked into wind and solar systems for my home in Michigan. Neither are rated to work well her and both cost huge amounts of money for almost no return in this area.

Now if the new nano-carbon tube systems are reliable and cheaper.. then maybe. But nothing for the near future.

]]> By: Mike's America http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-9598 Mike's America Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:31:06 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-9598 Solar energy is a good idea, but as you say <i>"The company currently has no product available"</i> means that solar is part of a future solution. Meanwhile, the socialists and one worlders at the UN are pushing for a global carbon tax (well, global really only means the West). Global warming alarmists know that time is running out. Not for planet earth, but time before their scaremongering is seen for what it is. As we tackle that threat to basic economic liberty we can move forward with energy alternatives. Solar energy is a good idea, but as you say “The company currently has no product available” means that solar is part of a future solution.

Meanwhile, the socialists and one worlders at the UN are pushing for a global carbon tax (well, global really only means the West).

Global warming alarmists know that time is running out. Not for planet earth, but time before their scaremongering is seen for what it is.

As we tackle that threat to basic economic liberty we can move forward with energy alternatives.

]]> By: Reggie Rasmussen http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-9597 Reggie Rasmussen Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:52:35 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-9597 No doubt that global warming is very debated. I, however, have never heard that man is causing global cooling. For this - all I can say is that I hope that the people that believe this is natural are not wrong. But if man is causing at least part of the problem then why not do all we can. One thing not in dispute is that we cannot continue to use non-renewable sources on energy forever. Are you familiar with the ground floor movement to take solar to the masses by a company called Citizenre? They are trying market solar with an approach similar to satellite TV, cellular telephones, and alarm systems. That is to provide the customer a complete solar system with no upfront charges and make money from a service contract. In this case the service contract would be a rent agreement. They intend to put a complete solar system on clients home. When the system produces electricity, it will lower the bill from the current utility provider. In most cases the savings from the lower bill will more than cover the rent fee that the company intends to charge. The company currently has no product available but intends to deploy in the middle of 2008. They are currently taking reservations and have over 26,000 takers so far. I have written several articles on this company in my blog and even have a couple of videos that I have recorded at www.solarjoules.com. Feel free to take a look. I welcome comments. As in any start up business, a chance exists that they may never get off the ground and fulfill any preorders, but if this is the case - the potential client has not lost anything. If you cannot afford the upfront cost of solar today, this may turn out to be a great alternative. This solution would mean that we could produce at least a little less pollution and would be a great step "just in case". And hey, the fact that you will save money on your electricity bill over time is a pretty good reason to look into it as well. No doubt that global warming is very debated. I, however, have never heard that man is causing global cooling. For this - all I can say is that I hope that the people that believe this is natural are not wrong. But if man is causing at least part of the problem then why not do all we can. One thing not in dispute is that we cannot continue to use non-renewable sources on energy forever.
Are you familiar with the ground floor movement to take solar to the masses by a company called Citizenre? They are trying market solar with an approach similar to satellite TV, cellular telephones, and alarm systems. That is to provide the customer a complete solar system with no upfront charges and make money from a service contract. In this case the service contract would be a rent agreement. They intend to put a complete solar system on clients home. When the system produces electricity, it will lower the bill from the current utility provider. In most cases the savings from the lower bill will more than cover the rent fee that the company intends to charge. The company currently has no product available but intends to deploy in the middle of 2008. They are currently taking reservations and have over 26,000 takers so far. I have written several articles on this company in my blog and even have a couple of videos that I have recorded at http://www.solarjoules.com. Feel free to take a look. I welcome comments. As in any start up business, a chance exists that they may never get off the ground and fulfill any preorders, but if this is the case - the potential client has not lost anything. If you cannot afford the upfront cost of solar today, this may turn out to be a great alternative. This solution would mean that we could produce at least a little less pollution and would be a great step “just in case”. And hey, the fact that you will save money on your electricity bill over time is a pretty good reason to look into it as well.

]]> By: jainphx http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-9596 jainphx Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:23:21 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-9596 G-D created this planet and there is nothing man can do to destroy it. They (man) may be able to destroy them selves, but the planet will remain till otherwise notified. G-D created this planet and there is nothing man can do to destroy it. They (man) may be able to destroy them selves, but the planet will remain till otherwise notified.

]]> By: ChrisG http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-9595 ChrisG Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:42:00 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-9595 "Is the climate changing?" Yes. It has never "stayed the same". It is cyclic. "Is it possible that some of the climate change is because of man". <b>IF</b> it is possible, why are these asinine environmental policies NOT curbing the real polluters: China, India, and Russia? Why do European cars have to be UPGRADED to meet stricter US emissions laws? Why are the environuts only going after the "politically correct" targets? Or is this just more "death to America" socialist crap? I believe the thread above answered that. "Should both the CIA and the US military stop wasting money on global climate change studies ?" <b>ABSOLUTELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<b> It is a waste of funds and a mis-use of money for these organizations to duplicate the work best done by others. Considering that a rapidly growing number of scientists are debunking man made global warming, along with the gross amounts of corrupted data from ill-placed temp sensors and the ignoring of historical data, the waste of funds becomes more apparent.</b></b> “Is the climate changing?” Yes. It has never “stayed the same”. It is cyclic.

“Is it possible that some of the climate change is because of man”. IF it is possible, why are these asinine environmental policies NOT curbing the real polluters: China, India, and Russia? Why do European cars have to be UPGRADED to meet stricter US emissions laws? Why are the environuts only going after the “politically correct” targets? Or is this just more “death to America” socialist crap?

I believe the thread above answered that.

“Should both the CIA and the US military stop wasting money on global climate change studies ?” ABSOLUTELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is a waste of funds and a mis-use of money for these organizations to duplicate the work best done by others. Considering that a rapidly growing number of scientists are debunking man made global warming, along with the gross amounts of corrupted data from ill-placed temp sensors and the ignoring of historical data, the waste of funds becomes more apparent.

]]> By: John Ryan http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-9594 John Ryan Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:19:59 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-9594 Is the climate changing ? Is it possible that some of the climate change is because of man Should both the CIA and the US military stop wasting money on global climate change studies ? Is the climate changing ?
Is it possible that some of the climate change is because of man
Should both the CIA and the US military stop wasting money on global climate change studies ?

]]> By: ChrisG http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-9593 ChrisG Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:11:24 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-9593 The "funny" part is that these were the exact same swindlers and socialists who were screaming "new ice age" 20 years ago. The logical fallacies "man made global warming" snake oil salesmen push are wonderous, as are those who believe them. Too little snow: Global warming Too much snow: Global warming Too little rain: Global Warming Too Much rain: Global Warming Earthquakes: Global Warming Fish migrations: Global Warming Wars: Global Warming Starvation/famine: Global Warming Record crops: Global Warming Glaciers Growing: Global Warming Glaciers shrinking: Global Warming Receding hairlines, bad hair days, too few babies, too many babies, grass too grean, grass too brown, etc etc etc: Glabal Warming.... You would think that more rational people would figure out this makes as much sense as "comet dust poisoning" did years ago when Haileys Comet's tail hit the Earth. The “funny” part is that these were the exact same swindlers and socialists who were screaming “new ice age” 20 years ago.

The logical fallacies “man made global warming” snake oil salesmen push are wonderous, as are those who believe them.

Too little snow: Global warming
Too much snow: Global warming
Too little rain: Global Warming
Too Much rain: Global Warming
Earthquakes: Global Warming
Fish migrations: Global Warming
Wars: Global Warming
Starvation/famine: Global Warming
Record crops: Global Warming
Glaciers Growing: Global Warming
Glaciers shrinking: Global Warming

Receding hairlines, bad hair days, too few babies, too many babies, grass too grean, grass too brown, etc etc etc: Glabal Warming….

You would think that more rational people would figure out this makes as much sense as “comet dust poisoning” did years ago when Haileys Comet’s tail hit the Earth.

]]> By: marinetbryant http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-9592 marinetbryant Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:01:43 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-9592 Getting closer to lock and load time! Tom Getting closer to lock and load time!

Tom

]]> By: Igor R. http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warmin/#comment-9591 Igor R. Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:56:06 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/12/17/the-consensus-on-global-warming-inside-the-ipcc-report/#comment-9591 In order to highlight Gaia's fever, the Christmas Tree urgently needs to be renamed the Global Warming Bush, or GW Bush for short. In order to highlight Gaia’s fever, the Christmas Tree urgently needs to be renamed the Global Warming Bush, or GW Bush for short.

]]>