More spurious comments from a Bush Hack and EPAer. So Ron Paul takes 500 dollars (unknowingly) from an opportunistic racist, repudiates the racist’s views and keeps his money (classic) and you get your panties in a bunch. You guys spend more time trying to discredit Paul and his supporters (which certainly won’t help the Republican candidate in the General, it makes me wonder what you are afraid of. BTW–what’s the current rate for hackery these days?

It’s official. Hate is officially the left’s only political platform.

You’ve poisoned yourself with hate Vigilante.

Get some therapy.

Hate is not love; not even in your twisted evil world.

http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/07/20/genocide-is-not-a-casus-belli/index.html#comment-16833
http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/07/29/gonzales-deserves-an-apology/index.html#comment-16892
http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/10/13/ap-finds-fault-with-our-troops/index.html#comment-28887
http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/10/23/you-might-be-interested-in/index.html#comment-29510

Who would vote for RP it seems. Speaks volumes about the candidate. He has the white supremacists, the twoofers and America hating lefties like Vigilante.

Perhaps the Prostitutes for Paul that are holding their funraiser (misspelling intentional) at the Moonlight Bunny Ranch, ought to get together with the Strippers for Ron Paul which Tucker Carlson has been getting lap dances with:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPfPnF4Mbog

P.S. bbartlog: How do you feel about being in the same club as an America hating nut like the commenter directly above your last one?

I doubt someone who refuses his own Congressional pension, returns part of his own office’s budget every year, and refused to participate in the federal student loan program on principle is going to suddenly turn corrupt. Paul is a true believer (full to the gills on his own Kool-aid, from your perspective). He’s not in it for the money.

In a way, you’ve paid Paul a backhanded compliment here. Because if there were another candidate among the current Republicans who spoke convincingly for ’smaller government, less taxation and the rest’, Paul wouldn’t be so closely associated with those things, and his candidacy couldn’t by itself bring credit or discredit to those ideas.
Anyway, I don’t see how Paul’s policies constitute an appeasement of radical Islam. We won’t be giving them any presents, unless you count ‘not launching a preemptive attack’ as some sort of gift. Our current foreign aid to Egypt (which Paul would end) looks a lot more like appeasement from where I’m sitting: we agreed to pay them what, $1.3 billion a year in order to buy lasting peace as part of the Camp David accords?
Further, you also need to look at motives when assessing whether something is appeasement. I think we can agree that our removal of troops from Saudi Arabia, while on Osama’s list of demands, did not constitute appeasement because it was done for our own reasons. Similarly, even if Paul removed troops from the Middle East, it would be in the context of a worldwide military drawdown including Okinawa, Germany, Korea and so on. Given that this has long been on his list of policy proposals I don’t think it could be construed as appeasement of any particular enemy.

Besides, Bryan’s the one that doesn’t mind being on the “fun” end of the camera, while AP steadfastly refuses even more than I do.

He gets all their cash. And because he is liked by the left for being anti-Iraq and an annoyance to republicans during the primaries, he’s not brought to account for it. If he somehow did become a serious Democratic challenger, they’d use those associations to destroy him in a heartbeat. Paul knows it.

Sure there are rules against a candidate just taking his left over campaign fund, but somehow I doubt that’s never been circumvented.

Who said Ron Paul was a white supremacist? I said he has lots of fans in the white supremacist movement.