8
Nov

Mitt Romney Visits Mike’s America

Posted by: Mike's America @ 1:41 pm in Politics  | 0 views

Romney: “A Yankee with Southern Values?”


Mike goes eyeball to eyeball with candidate Romney on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, Wednesday, November 7. Above, Romney answers Mike’s Question asking what assurance Romney could provide conservatives that if elected, he would govern as the conservative. Photo by Mike’s America

On the same day Rudy Giuliani cancelled a visit to Mike’s America so he could accept the endorsement of conservative Christian leader Pat Robertson, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney dropped in instead.

Around noon on Wednesday, Governor Romney arrived at “Stacks” Restaurant (no, it’s not a knockoff of Hooters, Stacks serves pancakes) on Hilton Head Island. Romney campaign planners were pleasantly surprised when twice the number of people expected showed up to meet Mitt and hear him speak.

Mitt delivered his standard stump speech citing the three pillars of his plan for America: 1. Strengthen our military (100,000 more troops and upgraded equipment) 2. Strengthen our economy (No taxes on savings or investments for those under $200,000 income) and 3. Strengthen our families (support traditional marriage).

The crowd, packed in like sardines and composed mainly of Senior Citizens, was politely enthusiastic. Many later said they thought Romney was the best conservative running and they trusted he would make a good President.

The following video clip by Michael Edenfield, online editor of the Island Packet gives you a taste of the event:



Later at an outdoor press briefing (1 minute 5 seconds into above video) A reporter asked Mitt how he would win over South Carolina’s social conservatives. He instantly went on the attack against Rudy Giuliani saying that he didn’t think “The Republican Party is going to choose a pro-choice, pro-gay Civil Union candidate to lead our party.”

Mike’s America asked the follow-up question (paraphrasing) “We’ve been disappointed in candidates who run as conservatives then compromise our values with Democrats. How would you assure South Carolina conservatives that you would govern as a conservative if elected President?”

Video Update: Mitt Answers Mike. WSAV in Savannah, Georgia was kind enough to post the answer to Mike’s question as a web exclusive. Click here to view. The video opens with Mitt describing his conservative bona fides in answering the question, then moves indoors for an extended video excerpt from Mitt’s Stump speech providing further details on his three pronged plan to 1. strengthen our military, 2. strengthen our economy and 3. strengthen Americas’ familes.

His answer was more a laundry list of conservative positions rather than any assurance on how he would govern. Perhaps a better answer might be to point to his accomplishments in Massachusetts achieved even with the handicap of a state legislature where Democrats hold a super-majority in both houses.

However you look at it, the question is a difficult one to answer and that’s why I ask that to all of the candidates if given the chance. Many conservatives are wary of politicians who tell us what they think we want to hear, which makes that question all the more valid. And Mitt did claim in his speech to be a “Yankee Governor with Southern values” while admitting when he goes to Iowa he is a “Yankee with Heartland values” and tells the folks back in New England he’s a “Yankee with Yankee values.”

Three Way Horse Race in SC About to become Two Way or Romney Runaway?

The latest South Carolina polling averages from Real Clear Politics show Romney edging up significantly to take the lead while top rivals Giuliani and Thompson are both down slightly. There is also some buzz on the national political scene that Thompson is not catching fire and that the GOP contest may come down to a two man race between Romney and Rudy.

On Hilton Head, Romney dodged a question about Mike Huckabee and focused his attack solely on Rudy. Jonathon Martin, who writes for the Politico, also attended Wednesday’s event and reports the Rudy campaign response:

Giuliani spokeswoman Maria Comella responded to Romney’s jab by noting that Romney himself had previously been pro-choice and favorably disposed to civil unions. “It would seem someone forgot to show Mitt Romney today’s USA/Gallup survey, Comella said. ” It’s clear that Republicans across the board are supporting the experienced candidate who actually sticks with his positions and has used conservative principles to get results.”

Romney: No More Mr. Nice Guy?

Romney is clearly taking off the gloves and going after Rudy. In a mailing to Iowa voters (photo) Romney slams New York as a Sanctuary City for illegal aliens with the direct implication that Rudy is to blame. “Cracking Down on Illegal Immigration” was the title of a more positive mailing in South Carolina, which also highlighted Romney’s record and conservative credentials.

Decision Time for Mike’s America

In a few weeks it will be time for me to make up my mind and declare myself in support of one of the GOP candidates. I’ve been fortunate to meet and question the top three personally and the subliminal vibe gained from that is what is helping me make up my mind.

Previous Visits in this series:

  • Share/Bookmark
Print This Post Print This Post
This entry was posted on Thursday, November 8th, 2007 at 1:41 pm and is filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

11 comments so far

 1Reply to this comment  

Great rundown Mike. It’s starting to come down to the wire and I have yet to come to a decision on who to support.

November 8th, 2007 at 6:57 pm
 2Reply to this comment  

You’ve still got time to make up your mind Curt. When is the California primary anyway?

The South Carolina primary is in 72 days on January 19th. I’m going to decide soon so I can advocate for my choice.

November 8th, 2007 at 7:19 pm
 3Reply to this comment  

Feb 5th, so a few weeks after yours. Quite a difficult race to decide this time around.

November 8th, 2007 at 7:22 pm
 4Reply to this comment  

You guys get the benefit of waiting to see how Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan and South Carolina shake out before you jump on the bandwagon.

I don’t want to wait until after Iowa. And as I’ve said to any and all, if my guy doesn’t win the nomination I have pledged to support the candidate who does.

After meeting the top of the field in person I can say we have a great selection of candidates to choose from.

November 8th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
crosspatch
 5Reply to this comment  

If he would lose that white shirt and tie and stop looking like one of those Mormon missionaries who goes door to door, people might not be so darned afraid of him.

Does he even OWN a golf shirt and a pair of Dockers? Maybe he needs to get a little less formal. He dresses like he just came out of church or something and he needs to get middle America to vote for him. He needs to be making them comfortable, not scaring the hell out of them.

Sure, there is something for looking Presidential … but there is a time and a place.

Lose the shirt and tie. Get a t-shirt and jeans at least for a few appearances.

November 8th, 2007 at 10:29 pm
ChrisG
 6Reply to this comment  

So ignore the issues and focus only on the clothing?

That idea sounds akin to the left debating who is a better dancer on the Ellen Show (they actually DID this).

Sorry, I want a President to dress professional, BE professional, and run on issues. Cheap gimmicks are for Hollywood and the Democrats.

November 9th, 2007 at 4:02 am
 7Reply to this comment  

Chris: I think what crosspatch is saying is that Mitt comes across as a bit stiff and formal. I don’t really want to see any of the candidates in a pair of shorts (Fred Thompson? good grief!) but I do get the point.

If I could have asked Mitt a second question it would have been about that hair moment he had at the last debate. It made him look more like a regular guy.

November 9th, 2007 at 7:21 am
DougL
 8Reply to this comment  

Crosspatch: Mitt visited Naples, Florida wearing a casual blue golf shirt and walked in our local Swamp Buggy parade with Congressman Connie Mack (who just endorsed Mitt along with our popular local Sheriff Don Hunter) a few weeks ago. I have a few photographs with him and my family. He was a normal guy and we were very impressed with him. First time I can recall a candidate for President visiting us in Naples and participating in our local parade.

November 9th, 2007 at 2:42 pm
 9Reply to this comment  

Thanks for that heads up DougL.

I found this photo presentation of the Naple’s event:

http://www.naplesnews.com/photos/galleries/2007/oct/27/romney_stumps_where_swamp_buggies_roll/33419/

November 9th, 2007 at 2:53 pm
Igor R.
 10Reply to this comment  

Mitt is whatever you want him to be. Fred is Fred. Ignore the buzz. The elites don’t want Fred. It’s your choice.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/1107/Fred_rolls_out_Social_Security_plan_revels_in_substance.html

November 9th, 2007 at 6:43 pm
 11Reply to this comment  

Bottom line: I don’t trust Mitt Romney and he is not a Conservative. If he were, he would not have been elected in liberal Massachusetts. He campaigned as a liberal to get elected in MA, governed as a liberal and now has flipped to campaigning as a ‘conservative’ in order to appeal to the national GOP (whose base is conservative).

So far, I have eliminated Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Mike Huckabee based on their pro-amnesty positions. I have eliminated Ron Paul based on… well a lot of things, too many to list. I have eliminated Mitt Romney for the reasons I posted above.

That leaves Fred Thompson, Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo.

I believe Congressman Tancredo is great on immigration, but not Presidential material. His efforts are best suited for legislation in the Congress.

This leaves, for me, Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter.

Fred Thompson disappointed me with his stance on the sanctity of life and he doesn’t seem to be campaigning with any sense of urgency.

So this gets me to Duncan Hunter.

I hear/read a lot of people say they support Duncan Hunter, “but he probably doesn’t have a chance to win, so I am supporting Rudy”. I’m tired of that. If everyone who actually supported a candidate, actually… you know… supported that candidate, he would have a chance to win. This whole attitude of entitlement and bullying to have the 2008 Presidential campaign be Hillary vs Rudy is wearing thin on me and turning me off to politics.

November 10th, 2007 at 2:43 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

If your comments get caught in spam a lot please log into your registered account before trying to comment again. You can email me if your comment is caught in spam

 

Identity Verification: If you wish to verify your commenter identity, so no one can steal it, click the below button: