US Forces Withdrawing From Iraq and Democrats Prepare to Take Credit

Loading

This morning I checked my emails and newsfeeds like I do every morning. Right away one story jumped out at me. I had thought that the Democrats’ Congress had given up with their faux resolutions against the Iraq War, given up on trying to cut funding for the troops (always a half-hearted effort on their part at best), and generally given up on actually trying to end the war with a politically-driven premature evacuation.

According to [The Hill](http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/sen.-levin-hints-at-emerging-democratic-strategy-on-iraq-2007-10-25.html), “Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) is working with a key appropriator on a strategy to halve the White House’s war-funding request to pressure President Bush into changing course in Iraq.” At first it looked like yet another impotent effort to grandstand for the Democratic Party’s anti-Bush/anti-war base; another attempt to look like they’re doing something. It seemed like another effort to cover up the lie that the Democratic Party EVER had a plan for their vaunted campaign draw issue, “The New Direction in Iraq” plan ([they never did](http://newsbusters.org/node/8944)).

Still, even before my first sips of coffee took hold, something still didn’t seem right (and it wasn’t that I was recovering from a dream about Nancy Pelosi and an S&M assistant in the Oval Office-thanks SNL!). No, the part about cutting funding in half for mid-late 2008 seemed familiar. I knew that there was something else scheduled to happen around that time. The election isn’t until late 2008. Hmmm, what’s supposed to happen in 2008, AND has something to do with withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq?

Then it hit me like a shot o’ Irish Whiskey in the java! U.S. forces are already scheduled to be withdrawing in that time frame. Cutting the funding to force a withdrawal is moot. There’s no point. Just a few weeks ago General Petraeus told Congress (including specifically Senator Carl Levin who is trying to cut funding for the war next year). I searched for his speech, and [there it was](http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2007/09/statement-by-general-petraeus-text.html):
>
> “…I have recommended a drawdown of the surge forces from Iraq [i.e THE WITHDRAWAL OF FORCES FROM IRAQ]. In fact, later this month, the Marine Expeditionary Unit deployed as part of the surge will depart Iraq. Beyond that, if my recommendations are approved, that unit’s departure will be followed by the withdrawal of a brigade combat team without replacement in mid-December and the further redeployment without replacement of four other brigade combat teams and the two surge Marine battalions in the first 7 months of 2008, until we reach the pre-surge level of 15 brigade combat teams by mid-July 2008. I would also like to discuss the period beyond next summer. _Force reductions will continue beyond the pre-surge levels of brigade combat teams that we will reach by mid-July 2008;…”
> -Gen Petraeus’ speech to Congress
> September 10, 2007

There it was. Senator Carl Levin is leading an effort to cut the funding for the war and force a politically-motivated withdrawal from Iraq, but….the withdrawal’s already started. American forces are withdrawing from Iraq. The order to start removing the temporary surge forces started almost three months ago. Orders to withdraw more forces will come in another 5 weeks. After that, more forces will be withdrawn with all of the surge forces out around June, and more withdrawals expected to be announced then. Given the time it takes to get forces in and out of the war (6 months), if substantial US forces are ordered out in June, then a huge portion of the US forces will be out of Iraq before the election in November (5 months later).

So, Senator Carl Levin and other Democratic Party leaders to thank for this? No way. Not at all. The success of American military men and women is what brought about the conditions for success-not Democrats cutting off the food, fuel, water, weapons, and ammo for our troops, but make NO MISTAKE about it, they are posturing to take credit for something they not only didn’t do, something they not only didn’t even help, but rather seeking to take credit for a success that they opposed.

Will anyone notice? Apparently not. Even today Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich supporters have barraged the web declaring that they support candidate X because he’ll end the war in Iraq. The NEWSFLASH that the withdrawals have begun didn’t quite make the news. If it had, then why are people still marching against the war “demanding” withdrawals of US forces that are already occurring and already scheduled?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Scott

This really doesn’t surprise me as a tactic.

I watch the left side just to see what they are up to and for the last couple of weeks I am picking up what seems to be an emerging concept for them.

I started with Rangel I believe but it is being more actively talked about on the left. The seem to be getting ready to do a push to propose bringing back the draft. From what I am reading it’s a two prong plan.

One if they can’t get it passed they use it as a political hammer in the elections.

Two if they get it passed then that will be what they consider the missing ingredient to kick protests into high gear like the VietNam glory days of protesting.

They figure either way it will still stir a hornets nest among the suddenly vocal anti-war types who realized they may have to put their butts on the line.

The left has been complaining for months about the lack of kids in the street and this seems to be their way to try to gin up some rage for the stage.

The draft again? greaaat…. Just what the Military does NOT want (we made recruiting and retention goals again this year).

They don’t really want it, it is planning to be used as a tactic to stir up protesters.

Here is a bleg over at kos land by MeteorBlades for street protesters

by Meteor Blades

Fri Oct 26, 2007 at 05:54:59 PM PDT

I can tell by the paltry response to recent Diaries on the subject that most Kossacks won’t be joining tomorrow’s National Day of Action Against the War in Iraq. Not even most Kossacks in the 12 locales where major protests will be taking place.

There are lots of perfectly understandable reasons for not going. You’re not actually against the Iraq war and occupation, for instance. You live 500 miles from the nearest protest city. You have a Saturday job. Or a project deadline. You need to study every hour of the weekend for a Monday exam. You promised to take your daughter to a ballgame. You desperately need to recreate after a tough week. You have serious mobility problems. You’re ill. You don’t want a photo of yourself in a protest march showing up on your pro-Bush boss’s desk. Or you just don’t want to go, period.

How can I legitimately argue with any of that?

But if you’re free from obligation at the time the nearest antiwar protest is held tomorrow and you’re staying away because you don’t like the organizers or because you think such actions are passé, I have to ask — respectfully — what will you be doing tomorrow to try to end the war?

 

What action will the KOSsacks want? A withdrawal? It’s happening? A withdrawal as fast as possible? It’s happening already.

These people shoulda listened to General Petraeus instead of just blowing him off before he even spoke ala Reid and MoveOn.

Isn’t it odd that the political party whose now aging elected members were at the forefront in protesting the draft during the Vietnam era now are doing everything they can to bring it back?