Comments on: TNR Responds

By: Looking Glass

Looking Glass — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:44:34 +0000

Kathy wrote, “TNR’s Foer could have spun sugar into cotton candy with less spin than this story.”

You got that right. Spinning like a blender full of manure, pretending the result is foamy chocolate.

By: Guy Montag

Guy Montag — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:09:53 +0000

Still betting that Eve Fairbanks had an editorial hand in this deal. Everything made up in the ‘diarist’ tales is similar to Fairbanksed tales.

By: CajunTiger

CajunTiger — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:40:45 +0000

I don’t know what is about anti-war liberals having this huge desire to make things looks so much worse here than they truly are…well…yeah…i know the reason…but you would think they would at least try to make up stuff that is believable. I have a co-worker out here that is very liberal and very illegal-Iraq-war-spouter (yet she doesn’t mind making some bucks off of it, so I guess she isn’t that much against it) and in her blog on MySpace yesterday we had to reprimand her big time for total fabrications, flat out lies and major OPSEC violations. Just one example is minutes after an attack on our base she is blogging about it to the world and her version is no where near reality which is a huge security risk especially when she starts telling of protective measures and movements in place for our safety. Thankfully she will be gone in 1 month, but it wouldn’t suprise me one bit if she didn’t become the latest “phony soldier” who is the darling of the left. I’ll be keeping an eye on her after she leaves in case she does though.

By: suek

suek — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:47:58 +0000

We’ve talked about “forgiving” Beauchamp if he changes his outlook and what he’s willing to say. IF is only two letters, but it’s still one of the biggest words in the dictionary. We may have to wait till he gets back to civilian life before we find out what really happened, and what sort of man he’s become – or not.

By: Kathy

Kathy — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:48:44 +0000

TNR’s Foer could have spun sugar into cotton candy with less spin than this story. I’m dizzy reading it. I guess if you can’t win the argument with facts, just dazzle them with crap is still the solution.

It works with the rest of the MSM.

Petulance on a cracker. Hors d’oeuvres for an entree of crap.

Here’s the problem TNR has, the truth is out. TNR’s story requires the willing suspension of disbelief – and all higher brain functions.

By: ChrisG

ChrisG — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:18:03 +0000

Par for the course.

TNR states it’s all the “evil” US Army’s Fault. TNR states it is pure as the wind-driven snow and there is “ample proof” of this (which TNR will never show until they have finished fabricating it).

If STB does get out and continue his stupidity at the behest of his wife and the left then he will go down as a scumbag fraud as more and more Soldiers will refute him.

His BC has stated, in effect, that this kid is a major screw-up, but he is our screw-up. The military, like other professional organizations, likes to take care of problems internally first. IF STB continues to screw-up, he will be dishonorably discharged or face judicial UCMJ. The TNR, however, could care less about the truth and reality as their golden calf of propaganda is revealed to be a false god and they want vengance against those who discovered this fact.

To the TNR, it is not about truth, but about silencing ANY who dare question them.

To think, all TNR had to do is admit who and what they are and most of the world would have said, “yes, we know you are agenda driven, biased, willfully lying leftists out to denegrate the USA and its efforts to combat militaristic Islam but thank you for your honesty” and this would have gone away. TNR would have still kept most of its readers and probably gotten more orders from ANSWER, ACT, WWP, and be mandated reading in College poly-sci classes.