Perhaps when you learn how to spell “hypocrisy” you’ll also understand it’s meaning.

I’ve been involved in politics at every level from the Court House to the White House and I’ve seen it all before.

You folks are following nothing more than the latest irrelevant fad candidate. And the sad thing is, that there are serious political issues involved from which your faddish campaign is an unwelcome distraction.

You’re going to have to grow up Jared. Reality isn’t what YOU think it is.

You’re the one I was hoping would wake up to the hypocracy. You can’t see it no matter what way I try and explain it to you. There may come a day when your old and gray and you will look back on the things in your lifetime. You will remember the good old days and realize how different life is without liberty and without peace. Because without these things all the money in the world will not make you happy.

Good luck to you sir.

I fully realize how desperate you and your fellow Paulians are to avoid dealing honestly with the grave issues that confront us. So you stick your heads in the sand (or somewhere else) and make all these irrelevant arguments.

You’re only fooling yourself. No one else.

When will you wake up and realize how foolish you have been?

To the person that wrote this: We funded and trained Al Queda. Bin Laden was really Tim Osman a CIA operative. So should Russia attack us? They didn’t. Why not? Cause they were in the wrong by invading. Invasions are hardly ever won. Unless of course we take all of the guns in the country before we invade.

I’d like to see you take responsibility for believing the lies about Iraq’s WMD,

Who lied?

You’re believing Fox News’ ridiculous claims again.

Where did Mike’s America cite from Fox News? What would you say if it came from CNN? This is from April, but there have been much, much more that’s been coming out regarding Iranian interference in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Maybe Michael Ledeen’s book “The Iranian Time Bomb: The Mullah Zealots’ Quest for Destruction” would be a good investment for you.

If the US normalized relations with Iran, there would be a democratic transition in that country and Iran would be a US allie.

Care to expound upon this novel approach? What do you mean by “normalize”?

. Due to the sanctions and the war, an entire generation of Iraqis are malnourished an uneducated.

So…the sanctions were cruel and unjustified on our part? We’re to blame for the malnourishment and education of Iraqis? I seem to recall watching 60 Minutes or something before the war, and seeing all these lavish palaces in every city, that Saddam would live in. I wonder where he got the money from…???

I also recall a certain “Food for Oil” program to appease the human rights watchers who blamed us rather than Saddam as teh abuser….how did that work itself out?

Many cities in Iraq have no running water or electricity. This is going on for 5 years now.

Many cities suffered shoddy infrastructure before the “Invasion” anyway, with piss-poor sewage system, running water, and electricity. We have been trying to improve conditions. Who’s to blame for the slow progress?

I’ve gone through this issue backwards and forwards and apparently you are the only one who feels Iranian attacks killing Americans in Iraq are “unsubstantiated.”

I guess you prefer to listen to the same people who have denied progress of our U.S. effort in Iraq. The same people who highlight every bad news story.

But you’re continued repetition of a lie or distortion won’t make it true, no matter how hard you try.

And you’re an even bigger fool if you think Iran can be appeased.

Though you are right. If we leave Iraq stability will quickly return. That would occur after the deaths of at least one million who would be murdered by Iranian backed Shiite and Al Queda death squads to punish the “collaborators.”
———————————–

And as long as the occupation continues, there will be no move towards stability, and millions more Iraqis will become refugees. Due to the sanctions and the war, an entire generation of Iraqis are malnourished an uneducated. Many cities in Iraq have no running water or electricity. This is going on for 5 years now. The US occupation prevents any move towards stability, because the Bush administration does not want to see the Shia militias control the streets, which is what NEEDS to happen for stability to come about.

———————-
And then Iran would control all of Southern Iraq while Al Queda would be free to use the remainder for it’s terrorist training operations.
————————-

Iran wouldn’t control Iraq anymore than China controlled Vietnam when the US left. What we do know for sure is that 5 years of occupation has resulted in millions of Iraqis living as refugees as probably close to an extra 1 million Iraqis dying due to the extra insecurity and instability that the war has brought.

————————————
Is that the kind of stability you want? I’d like to see you folks take some responsibility for your grossly irresponsible, naive, ignorant positions, but since most of you still shave only once a week and living in your Mom’s basement that might be asking a bit much.
——————————————

I’d like to see you take responsibility for believing the lies about Iraq’s WMD, starting a war that has created 4 million Iraqi refugees, and left most cities in Iraq without running water or electricity for 5 years.

—————————————-
And while we are on the subject of Iran: They founded, funded and trained Hezbollah which has been behind the deaths of 289 Americans prior to our invasion of Iraq. Iran’s Quods force has been behind the killing of American soldiers in Iraq.
————————————————

Hezbollah attacked the barracks in Beirut in 1983. Israel attacked the USSLiberty in 1967 killing 37 servicemen. The US gave Saddam satellite imagery to help target his chemical attacks on Iranian troops. Do you want to dig up history on everyone and say that peace will never be possible?

As far as your claim of Iran’s Qod’s force killing American soldiers, that is completely unsubstantiated. More than 50% of foreign fighters in Iraq are Saudis, while virtually no Iranian fighters have been found in Iraq.

You’re believing Fox News’ ridiculous claims again.

————————————-
And your only answer to that problem is to abandon ALL our friends and allies in the Middle East (not just Israel) and make the region a “no-go” zone for ALL Americans while the jihadis have free reign to sow murder and mayhem.
—————————————

If the US normalized relations with Iran, there would be a democratic transition in that country and Iran would be a US allie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGpY2hw7ao8

That’s all that matters. SUPPORT RON PAUL. The more I learn about America’s situation, the more of a Ron Paul fanatic I become.

Which candidate do you think has the best chances of beating Hillary?

How do you think that a pro-war candidate is going to win given the fact that the American public has turned against the war?

What do you think of the statement by Newt Gingrich? Which candidate other than Ron Paul, would you say offers the most radical break with the President and the government?

Please remember that we are all on the same side, and are just trying to figure out the best republican to win the general election. I have not read any post by a “Paulbot” which has been insulting to any other Republican candidate or poster. If you think that Ron Paul has no chance of getting the Republican nod, then I suggest that you tone down your rhetoric least any Ron Paul support either stays at home or votes for a 3rd party in the general election.

Cool off, and try to get an idea of the big picture.

A few percentage points in key states would be enough to hand the election to Hillary.

Maybe when you’re grown up you will understand.

You won’t be hearing from me again, to our mutual enjoyment.

I realize you likely were not born when John Anderson ran as an Independent Republican for President in 1980.

Anderson got enormous media buzz, but amounted to nothing.

Ross Perot was somewhat more successful as a fad candidate and his campaign did enable Bill Clinton to win twice.

Neither Ross Perot, nor Anderson could win the presidency.

The damage was worse in Perot’s case, but in Anderson’s could have potentially re-elected Jimmy Carter.

Again, YOU have to answer whether your actions will end up helping Hillary. I have yet to hear one of you say you are prepared for that consequence.

Ron Paul is going NOWHERE. So who benefits from your continued support of this fringe candidate?

President Hillary!