<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The True Face Of Our Enemy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/07/01/the-true-face-of-our-enemy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/07/01/the-true-face-of-our-enemy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Skye</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/07/01/the-true-face-of-our-enemy/#comment-4680</link>
		<dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/07/01/the-true-face-of-our-enemy/#comment-4680</guid>
		<description>"Can't deal with the job" isn't that Clinton's campaign slogan, Curt?

What do Dems care about slaughtered families in Iraq? The deceased families can't vote for them, and their deaths can't be pinned on US soldiers.This situation brings absolutely no political value to Democrats. Hence, the guilt-free 'cut and run' policy.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can&#8217;t deal with the job&#8221; isn&#8217;t that Clinton&#8217;s campaign slogan, Curt?</p>
<p>What do Dems care about slaughtered families in Iraq? The deceased families can&#8217;t vote for them, and their deaths can&#8217;t be pinned on US soldiers.This situation brings absolutely no political value to Democrats. Hence, the guilt-free &#8216;cut and run&#8217; policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/07/01/the-true-face-of-our-enemy/#comment-4679</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 07:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/07/01/the-true-face-of-our-enemy/#comment-4679</guid>
		<description>We knew how he felt about immigration in 2000, it's dishonest to now be shocked about it.

He most definitely is not just allowing Iran to attack wholesale, you can bet there are plenty of things going on behind the scenes but short of invading the country what can he do?  The Democrat controlled Congress sure won't let him do anything, the liberal Europeans won't let him....so he pushes a secret program for regime change which is quickly outed to the newspapers.

"Can't deal with the job"....please.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We knew how he felt about immigration in 2000, it&#8217;s dishonest to now be shocked about it.</p>
<p>He most definitely is not just allowing Iran to attack wholesale, you can bet there are plenty of things going on behind the scenes but short of invading the country what can he do?  The Democrat controlled Congress sure won&#8217;t let him do anything, the liberal Europeans won&#8217;t let him&#8230;.so he pushes a secret program for regime change which is quickly outed to the newspapers.</p>
<p>&#8220;Can&#8217;t deal with the job&#8221;&#8230;.please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David2</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/07/01/the-true-face-of-our-enemy/#comment-4678</link>
		<dc:creator>David2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 07:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/07/01/the-true-face-of-our-enemy/#comment-4678</guid>
		<description>I always thought that Bush was gearing up to deal with Iran at some point.  There are three carrier groups over there now?  But he doesn't seem to think border security is very important whether it involves protecting Americans here or American soldiers over there.
He seems willing to indefinitely allow Iranian attacks to go on.  Perhaps there is a grand strategy to deal with Iranian terror.  Or, more likely, we have the case of someone who can't deal with his job and is trying to coast until retirement.  He certainly has distanced himself from those who would support an attack on Iran.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that Bush was gearing up to deal with Iran at some point.  There are three carrier groups over there now?  But he doesn&#8217;t seem to think border security is very important whether it involves protecting Americans here or American soldiers over there.<br />
He seems willing to indefinitely allow Iranian attacks to go on.  Perhaps there is a grand strategy to deal with Iranian terror.  Or, more likely, we have the case of someone who can&#8217;t deal with his job and is trying to coast until retirement.  He certainly has distanced himself from those who would support an attack on Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
