Comments on: No Bias Here http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/12/24/no-bias-here/ Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:29:04 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Skye http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/12/24/no-bias-here/#comment-2204 Skye Sun, 24 Dec 2006 23:06:16 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/12/24/no-bias-here/#comment-2204 This is quite a story to digest, Curt. However, at the moment I'm looking forward to digesting some cookies and eggnog! Merry Christmas, Curt. I wish you and you family joy this season and a happy 2007! This is quite a story to digest, Curt. However, at the moment I’m looking forward to digesting some cookies and eggnog!

Merry Christmas, Curt. I wish you and you family joy this season and a happy 2007!

]]> By: sam pender http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/12/24/no-bias-here/#comment-2203 sam pender Sun, 24 Dec 2006 13:37:28 +0000 http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/12/24/no-bias-here/#comment-2203 Couldn't agree more. Wanna see something even more interesting...ask what ever happened to that USS Cole investigation that Pres Clinton ordered in Oct 00 (rather than retaliate against Afghanistan as he'd promised the Taliban). CNN reported on 10/17 that the NSC had stacks of intel showing it was an AQ attack. Clarke even writes about it in his book. So...why order an investigation? Ok, forget the why. What ever happened to it? In Feb 01 a blame report was released saying there should have been better security, but where's the report saying:<p> who made the unique, shaped-charge designed bomb where the bomb matl came from and answered the question of whether or not there was state sponsorship<p> I've tried FOIA requests of FBI, CIA, DoD, USN, ATF, and so forth and gotten nowhere. Here we are 16 years later and NO ONE will tell you where the bomb matl came from, who designed the special shaped charge, or if a state sponsored it. <p> Though Clinton FBI Dir Louis Freeh's book, MY FBI, gives a clue (pg 282), and The History Channel's got a show with a CIA case officer (face blacked out) where he does say a certain state sponsored the attack "tutored" the bomb makers, and provided the high explosive (hint, remember Sen Kerry's Oct Surprise in 11/04 of "missing RDX")<p> Berger's cover up is just another in a series of deliberate efforts on the part of Democrats-particularly the Clinton Admin-to hide the dangers of the world from the American people for their own political gain rather than national security.<p> They turned down offers to grab UBL<p> They cast aside 8-11 operations to capture/kill UBL<p> Clarke tipped off the UAE that one of their princes was in the crosshairs in 2/99 just so he (our "counter-terrorism czar") could close a multi-billion dollar arms sale of F-16's to the UAE<p> The highest terrorist threat the nation had ever seen before 911 was in Dec98, but when Clinton met with the head of Pakistan he didn't even mention UBL or AQ<p> They're tomahawk retaliation strike for the African Embassy Bombings was a farce since Sec State Albright called the Pakistanis and tipped off UBL to get outta dodge while the missiles were in the air<p> They conducted bombing campaigns on Iraq rather than invade (despite having built up and threatened to invade three times)<p> Pres Clinton even called back the bombers from bombing Iraq in 11/98 while they were in the air because he trusted an agreement with Saddam (one that was broken not even 2wks later)<p> The African Embassy bombings were set in motion (surely out of pure coincidence) just days after Zawahiri was in Iraq meeting with Iraqi officials.<p> In Feb 98 Zawahiri was in Iraq meeting with Iraqi officials and within 72hrs, UBL declared war on the US focusing on US oppression of Iraqis<p> My favorite revisionist history is <a href="http://www.mediaresearch.org/rm/cyber/2004/binladen061704/segment1.ram" rel="nofollow">this one</a> though:<p> In the post-911 world, first we had Clarke and Berger working together to cover their fubars. Then as Iraq was put on a path to final resolution we have the re-writing of history from Democrats charged with oversight and maintenance of the failed American intelligence community. Instead of owning up and saying, "Yeah, we let the IC go to hell and fall apart" they cried, "Bush lied. He tricked us. We're morons and he's smart." They pretend AQ and Iraq never had any ties and they use faux reports to try and cover their tracks. Sad.<p> Where's Berger's papers?<p> Where's this detailed report on the Cole showing who built the bomb, and where the matl came from?<p> How much did Clarke make from his UAE arms deal, and was it worth letting UBL go?<p> Dems talk about accountability and oversight in the new Congress.<p> Ooooooooooo, pardon me while I don't hold my breath.</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> Couldn’t agree more. Wanna see something even more interesting…ask what ever happened to that USS Cole investigation that Pres Clinton ordered in Oct 00 (rather than retaliate against Afghanistan as he’d promised the Taliban). CNN reported on 10/17 that the NSC had stacks of intel showing it was an AQ attack. Clarke even writes about it in his book. So…why order an investigation? Ok, forget the why. What ever happened to it? In Feb 01 a blame report was released saying there should have been better security, but where’s the report saying:

who made the unique, shaped-charge designed bomb
where the bomb matl came from and answered the question of whether or not there was state sponsorship

I’ve tried FOIA requests of FBI, CIA, DoD, USN, ATF, and so forth and gotten nowhere. Here we are 16 years later and NO ONE will tell you where the bomb matl came from, who designed the special shaped charge, or if a state sponsored it.

Though Clinton FBI Dir Louis Freeh’s book, MY FBI, gives a clue (pg 282), and The History Channel’s got a show with a CIA case officer (face blacked out) where he does say a certain state sponsored the attack “tutored” the bomb makers, and provided the high explosive (hint, remember Sen Kerry’s Oct Surprise in 11/04 of “missing RDX”)

Berger’s cover up is just another in a series of deliberate efforts on the part of Democrats-particularly the Clinton Admin-to hide the dangers of the world from the American people for their own political gain rather than national security.

They turned down offers to grab UBL

They cast aside 8-11 operations to capture/kill UBL

Clarke tipped off the UAE that one of their princes was in the crosshairs in 2/99 just so he (our “counter-terrorism czar”) could close a multi-billion dollar arms sale of F-16’s to the UAE

The highest terrorist threat the nation had ever seen before 911 was in Dec98, but when Clinton met with the head of Pakistan he didn’t even mention UBL or AQ

They’re tomahawk retaliation strike for the African Embassy Bombings was a farce since Sec State Albright called the Pakistanis and tipped off UBL to get outta dodge while the missiles were in the air

They conducted bombing campaigns on Iraq rather than invade (despite having built up and threatened to invade three times)

Pres Clinton even called back the bombers from bombing Iraq in 11/98 while they were in the air because he trusted an agreement with Saddam (one that was broken not even 2wks later)

The African Embassy bombings were set in motion (surely out of pure coincidence) just days after Zawahiri was in Iraq meeting with Iraqi officials.

In Feb 98 Zawahiri was in Iraq meeting with Iraqi officials and within 72hrs, UBL declared war on the US focusing on US oppression of Iraqis

My favorite revisionist history is this one though:

In the post-911 world, first we had Clarke and Berger working together to cover their fubars. Then as Iraq was put on a path to final resolution we have the re-writing of history from Democrats charged with oversight and maintenance of the failed American intelligence community. Instead of owning up and saying, “Yeah, we let the IC go to hell and fall apart” they cried, “Bush lied. He tricked us. We’re morons and he’s smart.” They pretend AQ and Iraq never had any ties and they use faux reports to try and cover their tracks. Sad.

Where’s Berger’s papers?

Where’s this detailed report on the Cole showing who built the bomb, and where the matl came from?

How much did Clarke make from his UAE arms deal, and was it worth letting UBL go?

Dems talk about accountability and oversight in the new Congress.

Ooooooooooo, pardon me while I don’t hold my breath.

]]>