<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Osama In The Crosshairs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:40:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TampaConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/#comment-1623</link>
		<dc:creator>TampaConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/#comment-1623</guid>
		<description>As a conservative I STRONLY urge ABC to correct the falsehoods and misrepresentations in the upcoming &quot;Path to 9/11&quot; before it is shown. And I am not the only conservative say this.

John Podhoretz, conservative columnist and Fox News contributor says: The portrait of Albright is an unacceptable revision of recent history and an unfair mark on a public servant who, no matter her shortcomings, doesn&#039;t deserve to be remembered by millions of Americans as the inadvertent (and truculent) savior of Osama bin Laden. Samuel Berger, Clinton&#039;s national security adviser, also seems to have just cause for complaint.

James Taranto, OpinionJournal.com editor says: The Clintonites may have a point here. A few years ago, when the shoe was on the other foot, we were happy to see CBS scotch &quot;The Reagans.&quot;

Dean Barnett, conservative commentator posting on Hugh Hewitt&#039;s blog says: One can (if one so chooses) give the filmmakers artistic license to [fabricate a scene]. But if that is what they have done, conservative analysts who back this movie as a historical document will mortgage their credibility doing so.

Chris Wallace, Fox News Sunday anchor says: When you put somebody on the screen and say that&#039;s Madeleine Albright and she said this in a specific conversation and she never did say it, I think it&#039;s slanderous, I think it&#039;s defamatory and I think that ABC and Disney should be held to account.

Captain&#039;s Quarters blog says:If the Democrats do not like what ABC wants to broadcast, they have every right to protest it -- and in this case, they had a point.

Bill Bennett, conservative author, radio host, and TV commentator says: Look, &quot;The Path to 9/11&quot; is strewn with a lot of problems and I think there were problems in the Clinton administration. But that&#039;s no reason to falsify the record, falsify conversations by either the president or his leading people and you know it just shouldn&#039;t happen.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a conservative I STRONLY urge ABC to correct the falsehoods and misrepresentations in the upcoming &#8220;Path to 9/11&#8243; before it is shown. And I am not the only conservative say this.</p>
<p>John Podhoretz, conservative columnist and Fox News contributor says: The portrait of Albright is an unacceptable revision of recent history and an unfair mark on a public servant who, no matter her shortcomings, doesn&#8217;t deserve to be remembered by millions of Americans as the inadvertent (and truculent) savior of Osama bin Laden. Samuel Berger, Clinton&#8217;s national security adviser, also seems to have just cause for complaint.</p>
<p>James Taranto, <a href="http://OpinionJournal.com" title="http://OpinionJournal.com" class="autohyperlink" target="_blank">OpinionJournal.com&#8230;</a> editor says: The Clintonites may have a point here. A few years ago, when the shoe was on the other foot, we were happy to see CBS scotch &#8220;The Reagans.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dean Barnett, conservative commentator posting on Hugh Hewitt&#8217;s blog says: One can (if one so chooses) give the filmmakers artistic license to [fabricate a scene]. But if that is what they have done, conservative analysts who back this movie as a historical document will mortgage their credibility doing so.</p>
<p>Chris Wallace, Fox News Sunday anchor says: When you put somebody on the screen and say that&#8217;s Madeleine Albright and she said this in a specific conversation and she never did say it, I think it&#8217;s slanderous, I think it&#8217;s defamatory and I think that ABC and Disney should be held to account.</p>
<p>Captain&#8217;s Quarters blog says:If the Democrats do not like what ABC wants to broadcast, they have every right to protest it &#8212; and in this case, they had a point.</p>
<p>Bill Bennett, conservative author, radio host, and TV commentator says: Look, &#8220;The Path to 9/11&#8243; is strewn with a lot of problems and I think there were problems in the Clinton administration. But that&#8217;s no reason to falsify the record, falsify conversations by either the president or his leading people and you know it just shouldn&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasFred</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasFred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/08/osama-in-the-crosshairs/#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>I seem to remember another POTUS that wouldn&#039;t &#039;pull the trigger&#039; too...

1991, Iraq, Saddam, an &quot;A&quot; Team, Saddam in the &#039;cross hairs&#039; and Bush 41 said NO...

Imagine that...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to remember another POTUS that wouldn&#8217;t &#8216;pull the trigger&#8217; too&#8230;</p>
<p>1991, Iraq, Saddam, an &#8220;A&#8221; Team, Saddam in the &#8216;cross hairs&#8217; and Bush 41 said NO&#8230;</p>
<p>Imagine that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
