<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Left&#8217;s Perfect Posterboy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:27:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reasic</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/#comment-1603</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/#comment-1603</guid>
		<description>Curt,

I&#039;ve got to agree with you on this one.  Mike Malloy is despicable.  Also, the quote you provided in the &quot;UPDATE&quot; was nuts.  I think the majority of people on the &quot;left&quot; will agree with me.

The only two exceptions I have with this one are that you&#039;ve lumped a group of people under one stereo type, as if they all have the same exact beliefs, and then you take a some nutty idiotic examples and use those as examples of the entire group.  This is definitely faulty logic, and if you could realize this, you might not hate what you consider to the &quot;left&quot; so much.  The group that these nuts like your poster in the update represents probably only consists of a very few people, and definitely does not include any prominent Democrats.

All of this name-calling and divisiveness accomplishes nothing.  You&#039;ve even lumped me into that group, which disturbs me, &#039;cause you don&#039;t know me.  If you did, I guarantee you would think differently.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curt,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got to agree with you on this one.  Mike Malloy is despicable.  Also, the quote you provided in the &#8220;UPDATE&#8221; was nuts.  I think the majority of people on the &#8220;left&#8221; will agree with me.</p>
<p>The only two exceptions I have with this one are that you&#8217;ve lumped a group of people under one stereo type, as if they all have the same exact beliefs, and then you take a some nutty idiotic examples and use those as examples of the entire group.  This is definitely faulty logic, and if you could realize this, you might not hate what you consider to the &#8220;left&#8221; so much.  The group that these nuts like your poster in the update represents probably only consists of a very few people, and definitely does not include any prominent Democrats.</p>
<p>All of this name-calling and divisiveness accomplishes nothing.  You&#8217;ve even lumped me into that group, which disturbs me, &#8217;cause you don&#8217;t know me.  If you did, I guarantee you would think differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>Curt, seeing as I have a life, and have never listened to Mike Malloy, I would ask this:  Who is he???  Ha ha ha
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curt, seeing as I have a life, and have never listened to Mike Malloy, I would ask this:  Who is he???  Ha ha ha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>carol johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>&quot;...No ideas, just hate. Just a load of angry insults full of contempt and nihilism.&quot;

The very best our education system can provide!  Garbage in, garbage out.

Good thing I&#039;m an optimist, eh?   :flush_tb:

Carol
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;No ideas, just hate. Just a load of angry insults full of contempt and nihilism.&#8221;</p>
<p>The very best our education system can provide!  Garbage in, garbage out.</p>
<p>Good thing I&#8217;m an optimist, eh?   :flush_tb:</p>
<p>Carol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Webloggin&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;(Video Blog) Libs Exploit 9/11 Video Footage and Felled Soldiers in Attack Touting Bush Conspiracy...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ultra-Liberal radio talk show host Mike Malloy was fired from Air America last week. This prompted him to join up with his hard core followers in response with a Save Mike Malloy video campaign that exploits 9/11 video footage and images of soldiers co...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Webloggin</strong></p>
<p><strong>(Video Blog) Libs Exploit 9/11 Video Footage and Felled Soldiers in Attack Touting Bush Conspiracy&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ultra-Liberal radio talk show host Mike Malloy was fired from Air America last week. This prompted him to join up with his hard core followers in response with a Save Mike Malloy video campaign that exploits 9/11 video footage and images of soldiers co&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasic</title>
		<link>http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/#comment-1602</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/05/the-lefts-perfect-posterboy/#comment-1602</guid>
		<description>Once again, no response.  What a conspiracy waste land.  Heaven forbid someone dare to challenge your cherished beliefs.

Take Stephen Hayes, for example.  He has based much of his research on a Defense Dept. memo that was released by Douglas Feith in response to a request from Congress about some unfounded claims he made during a hearing.  Soon after Hayes&#039; initial claims based on this memo, the Defense Dept. even released another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2003/nr20031115-0642.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;memo&lt;/a&gt;, stating that &quot;the classified annex was not an analysis of the substantive issue of the relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda, and it drew no conclusions.&quot;  Many of Hayes&#039; claims are unsubstantiated, and if you&#039;d just engage me in some conversation, I could show you that.  It seems, however, that you would rather simply ignore anyone who disagrees with you.  I know this is hard for you to do, but let&#039;s just imagine for a second that you might be wrong.  How will you ever figure that out unless you test your ideas against those that disagree?  Answer: you won&#039;t.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, no response.  What a conspiracy waste land.  Heaven forbid someone dare to challenge your cherished beliefs.</p>
<p>Take Stephen Hayes, for example.  He has based much of his research on a Defense Dept. memo that was released by Douglas Feith in response to a request from Congress about some unfounded claims he made during a hearing.  Soon after Hayes&#8217; initial claims based on this memo, the Defense Dept. even released another <a href="http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2003/nr20031115-0642.html" rel="nofollow">memo</a>, stating that &#8220;the classified annex was not an analysis of the substantive issue of the relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda, and it drew no conclusions.&#8221;  Many of Hayes&#8217; claims are unsubstantiated, and if you&#8217;d just engage me in some conversation, I could show you that.  It seems, however, that you would rather simply ignore anyone who disagrees with you.  I know this is hard for you to do, but let&#8217;s just imagine for a second that you might be wrong.  How will you ever figure that out unless you test your ideas against those that disagree?  Answer: you won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
