Comments on: Communist News Network At It Again

By: No, he can’t be… « Homeless on the High Desert

No, he can’t be… « Homeless on the High Desert — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 00:22:04 +0000

[...] 16, 2008 in Campaign ‘08 he’s only half white. The most trusted name in news, the Communist News Network, has finally asked the burning question: Is Obama the Anti-Christ? Apparently a not-insignificant [...]

By: Steve Nelson

Steve Nelson — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:20:59 +0000

Subliminals are used in about 99% of what

you see hear and ‘feel’.

I can’t give details. I found this career with one word on google.

Entrainment….don’t worry, the links have been ’sanatized’

Just be aware if your feelings change suddenly. Then think twice about it.

’nuff said.

The X is a ‘red herring’.

By: Wayne

Wayne — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:20:59 +0000

[â€¦]Joining me to explain what happened Steve our CNN director of technical operations.

We’re putting you on the hot seat here.

People at home are watching Vice President Dick Cheney.

What happened?

What were we trying to create behind the scenes?

At the end of the speech the plan was to do, to have a CNN logo up on the screen and use that as the way of getting back from the speech back to you on camera and one of the many graphics we use here at CNN.

Since I don’t watch CNN, could someone please tell me how many times has anyone seen this “CNN logo” used after a live speech?

By: Gina Cobb

Gina Cobb — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:20:59 +0000

"X" Over Cheney: (A) Juvenile (B) Scary On Monday, CNN, a major cable news network, repeatedly superimposed flashing "X's" over the face of the Vice President of the United States during a televised speech pertaining to national security and the war in Iraq. CNN's explanation is that it was a technological malfunction. It's possible. Or it might have been deliberate but might be impossible to prove. That is what is called "plausible deniability." But is it even plausible? Read more . . .

By: Aakash

Aakash — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:20:59 +0000

Regarding the title of this entry… I would actually refer to it as the “Clinton News Network”!

By: tommy

tommy — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:20:59 +0000

“assclowns”? My, what a way with words you people have. Anyone new in here–like me–would have to conclude that there isn’t much brainpower in here. But I suppose anyone who supports an out-and-out war criminal like Cheney falls into the dim bulb category in the first place anyway.

By: Polunatic

Polunatic — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:20:59 +0000

That it was an “X”, and not a “G” (as in God) or an “A” or “B” is proof enough for me that this is truly a sinister plot.

Cheney & The X-Files

By: John

John — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:20:59 +0000

Take it easy everyone. I’m a television newscast director and my analysis was posted on Michelle Malkin’s site

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/003970.htm

No conspiracy this time, folks. Just simple human error.